<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Barnes Valuation Model is Neutral</title>
	<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/barnes-valuation-model-is-neutral-1076.html</link>
	<description>Freshly squeezed market commentary &#038; analysis</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Maverick</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/barnes-valuation-model-is-neutral-1076.html#comment-32306</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 06:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/barnes-valuation-model-is-neutral-1076.html#comment-32306</guid>
					<description>Hi Babak,

Just curious. What is the current reading of the Barnes Index? I would have to guess that it is giving an off-the-charts reading that stocks are much more favorably valued relative to bonds.

Any input on that?

Maverick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Babak,</p>
<p>Just curious. What is the current reading of the Barnes Index? I would have to guess that it is giving an off-the-charts reading that stocks are much more favorably valued relative to bonds.</p>
<p>Any input on that?</p>
<p>Maverick
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Stephen Rawls</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/barnes-valuation-model-is-neutral-1076.html#comment-8544</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 17:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/barnes-valuation-model-is-neutral-1076.html#comment-8544</guid>
					<description>Does anyone have a link to the Barnes Index values?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone have a link to the Barnes Index values?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
