<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Corporate Insiders In Buying Frenzy</title>
	<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/corporate-insiders-in-buying-frenzy-2096.html</link>
	<description>Freshly squeezed market commentary &#038; analysis</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/corporate-insiders-in-buying-frenzy-2096.html#comment-36240</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 15:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/corporate-insiders-in-buying-frenzy-2096.html#comment-36240</guid>
					<description>Insiders appear to be wrong so far. Look at REI_un for example. It has fallen. And ABX? It's near its 2008 high!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Insiders appear to be wrong so far. Look at REI_un for example. It has fallen. And ABX? It&#8217;s near its 2008 high!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: p2p Capital Group &#187; Corporate Buying Frenzy</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/corporate-insiders-in-buying-frenzy-2096.html#comment-35727</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 14:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/corporate-insiders-in-buying-frenzy-2096.html#comment-35727</guid>
					<description>[...] clipped from www.tradersnarrative.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] clipped from <a href='http://www.tradersnarrative.com' rel='nofollow'>www.tradersnarrative.com</a> [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: zentrader.ca &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Evening Reading</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/corporate-insiders-in-buying-frenzy-2096.html#comment-35724</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 03:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/corporate-insiders-in-buying-frenzy-2096.html#comment-35724</guid>
					<description>[...] Corporate Insiders In Buying Frenzy - From Trader&amp;#8217;s Narrative, making a bullish case. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Corporate Insiders In Buying Frenzy - From Trader&#8217;s Narrative, making a bullish case. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Babak</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/corporate-insiders-in-buying-frenzy-2096.html#comment-35721</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 19:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/corporate-insiders-in-buying-frenzy-2096.html#comment-35721</guid>
					<description>Ted, what we are seeing is a 100 year flood type situation because before, when insiders would step up buying at a certain level, it would coincide with a market bottom, but as you point out, that didn't happen for the last 3 times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ted, what we are seeing is a 100 year flood type situation because before, when insiders would step up buying at a certain level, it would coincide with a market bottom, but as you point out, that didn&#8217;t happen for the last 3 times.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ted Murphy</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/corporate-insiders-in-buying-frenzy-2096.html#comment-35720</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/corporate-insiders-in-buying-frenzy-2096.html#comment-35720</guid>
					<description>Excellent chart -- I had not been aware of this.  I will point out that this is the fourth spike down in the last year and a half, meaning that insiders had incorrectly called the bottom three times in the recent past.  Fourth time is the charm, perhaps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent chart &#8212; I had not been aware of this.  I will point out that this is the fourth spike down in the last year and a half, meaning that insiders had incorrectly called the bottom three times in the recent past.  Fourth time is the charm, perhaps.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
