It seems you have JavaScript disabled.

Ummm.. Yeah... I'm going to have to ask you to turn Javascript back on... Yeah... Thanks.

Richard Russell: Dow Theory Bullish




After Richard Russell’s recent bullish pronouncement that “an unprecedented world boom lies ahead” many - especially the permabears - have interpreted this as the last great bear throwing in the towel.

They go on to claim that this capitulation by the formerly bearish Dow Theory guru means that we are at the top and about to crash. I find this sort of thinking to be nonsense. First, the idea that the market tops when everyone is a bull is true. That’s because with everyone on one side, there’s no one to provide buying pressure to drive the market higher.

But is that the situation we have? According to sentiment the retail investor is keeping as far away from the stock market as they possibly can. Presumably they are otherwise occupied in real estate, flipping condos. And what about all the other gurus out there that are still preaching doom and gloom? that a crash is just around the next new high?

Most importantly though, those that interpret Russell’s new bullish stance as capitulation simply do not understand what he has been writing about for the past 50 years: Dow Theory.

Dow Theory is a mechanical system that, although far from perfect, leaves little room for interpretation. Simply put, when the indices are in synch and reaching new highs, Russell could not do anything but follow the clear signal and write what he did. He wasn’t capitulating to anything. He was simply following the playbook he’s been following since he became involved with the markets.

No one knows the future. Are we truly at the foot of an unprecedented global boom or are we just days away from a devastating crash? What we do know is that sentiment is decisively bearish out there and there are still plenty of naysayers that criticise and disbelieve in the performance of the markets.

Richard Russell with B-25 Mitchell Bomber in Italy (1944):
Richard Russell Dow Theory.png

Technorati , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Enjoyed this? Don't miss the next one, grab the feed  or 

                               subscribe through email:  


3 Responses to “Did Richard Russell Capitulate?”  

  1. 1 Werner Merthens

    This is a very nice article. I agree with your comments about the chronic bears. The Dow Theory can be and probably should be interpreted mechanically. However, I doubt that Mr. Russell follows a strictly mechanical approach. If he did, he would have turned bullish somewhere around June 2003 and would not have turned bearish anytime in between now and then. How can I say that? Well, I have tested a computer model of the Dow Theory and June 2003 is pretty solid regardless of parameter settings.
    So, I suspect that Mr. Russell does not follow a strictly mechanical approach and may use “other, proprietary indicators” for his predictions. This time around he got caught with his pants down and has missed a good part of the last bullmarket.
    At any rate, I have documented my test methodology and test results. Reading it may be a bit tedious, but in case anybody cares here is a link to the report:
    http://www.mydatabus.com/5z/tznvy.pbz/Werner.Merthens/TheDowTheory.pdf

  2. 2 Babak

    Werner, you’re right. I suspect that he changed his mind because he saw a tenaciously bullish market. But most importantly, the value part of the Dow Theory kicked in. The permabears hate to be reminded of this or poo-pooh it but the P/E ratios are actually looking very reasonable. This is just guesswork though because unless you get inside his head, who knows why he didn’t go bullish earlier and why he did now.

    Thanks for the link btw, I’ll check it out.

  3. 3 HP

    Simply ask the “Venerable” Mr. Russell the same simple question you should ask any of your advisers: “Mr. Russell, over the course of your career as an investment guru, have you made more money off your newsletter or your investments?

    If it’s the investments then why do you write?
    If it’s the writing, you aren’t qualified.
    My guess it’s the second.

    Ask your money manager, your broker, etc a similar question sometime. The results are more instructive than any course or advice could possibly be.

Leave a Reply



Recent Comments

  • Fernando : Yeah sorry i forgot to put down the website of the firm i use: http://staralliancecapital.com/ They are…
  • ty : anyone know of any firms that have API’s that can hook up directly to tradestation?…
  • Kronos : Spartacus, Thank you for your description. I am in Toronto as well, and I heard about…
  • B4banko : StevenK Intraday, I don’t think overnight applies because the buying power drops to 4-1 overnight. The…
  • Andrew : Excellent article Babak. It’s a very simple and interesting indicator which is based on a logical…
  • StevenK : B4banko, Thank you that is very helpful I will check them out…This may be a stupid…
  • B4banko : StevenK http://www.worldwidetradingcapital.com/ This is who I use. A private capitol group is who they set my…

  feed

 Or subscribe through email:

Creative Commons License

Disclaimer

The contents of this website are presented for informational purposes only. They should not be viewed as investment advice, nor a solicitation to buy or sell any financial securities. Neither, TradersNarrative.com, its owners, and/or its representatives are registered as securities broker-dealers or investment advisors with any securities regulatory authority, in any jurisdiction.