Comments on: Don’t Buy What Wall Street Sells http://www.tradersnarrative.com/dont-buy-what-wall-street-sells-349.html Freshly squeezed market commentary & analysis Tue, 07 Oct 2008 10:29:44 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2 by: iShares FTSE NAREIT Mortgage REITs Index Fund (REM) http://www.tradersnarrative.com/dont-buy-what-wall-street-sells-349.html#comment-14525 Wed, 22 Aug 2007 21:01:25 +0000 http://www.tradersnarrative.com/dont-buy-what-wall-street-sells-349.html#comment-14525 [...] I’ve already mentioned several examples of this: Don’t Buy What Wall St. Sells [...] […] I’ve already mentioned several examples of this: Don’t Buy What Wall St. Sells […]

]]> by: Uranium Participation Units & NYMEX UxC Uranium Futures http://www.tradersnarrative.com/dont-buy-what-wall-street-sells-349.html#comment-5863 Fri, 27 Apr 2007 19:27:14 +0000 http://www.tradersnarrative.com/dont-buy-what-wall-street-sells-349.html#comment-5863 [...] Watch Out! Historically, the introduction of a new contract has usually meant an intermediate high in prices. But since this is non-directional, it won’t affect me. If you’re long uranium or uranium stocks though, we could be in for a rough patch as this is a reliable contrarian indicator. [...] […] Watch Out! Historically, the introduction of a new contract has usually meant an intermediate high in prices. But since this is non-directional, it won’t affect me. If you’re long uranium or uranium stocks though, we could be in for a rough patch as this is a reliable contrarian indicator. […]

]]> by: james http://www.tradersnarrative.com/dont-buy-what-wall-street-sells-349.html#comment-898 Tue, 01 Aug 2006 21:39:41 +0000 http://www.tradersnarrative.com/dont-buy-what-wall-street-sells-349.html#comment-898 Marketing is marketing. Marketing is marketing.

]]> by: peter http://www.tradersnarrative.com/dont-buy-what-wall-street-sells-349.html#comment-197 Thu, 15 Jun 2006 01:26:26 +0000 http://www.tradersnarrative.com/dont-buy-what-wall-street-sells-349.html#comment-197 what is the credibility of <a href="http://news.goldseek.com/GoldSeek/1150383720.php">this</a>? what is the credibility of this?

]]> by: Babak http://www.tradersnarrative.com/dont-buy-what-wall-street-sells-349.html#comment-194 Wed, 14 Jun 2006 19:54:58 +0000 http://www.tradersnarrative.com/dont-buy-what-wall-street-sells-349.html#comment-194 CM: yeah, I was referring to a shorter time frame and pointing out that almost always the first to buy (investors who clamor for these things) will go underwater almost immediately. How many who bought at $45 held on to $70? Michael: correctomundo :) There is also GDX - the new gold miners ETF. CM: yeah, I was referring to a shorter time frame and pointing out that almost always the first to buy (investors who clamor for these things) will go underwater almost immediately. How many who bought at $45 held on to $70?

Michael: correctomundo :) There is also GDX - the new gold miners ETF.

]]> by: Michael http://www.tradersnarrative.com/dont-buy-what-wall-street-sells-349.html#comment-188 Wed, 14 Jun 2006 12:02:35 +0000 http://www.tradersnarrative.com/dont-buy-what-wall-street-sells-349.html#comment-188 USO fits the pattern too! USO fits the pattern too!

]]> by: C. Maoxian http://www.tradersnarrative.com/dont-buy-what-wall-street-sells-349.html#comment-186 Wed, 14 Jun 2006 08:50:10 +0000 http://www.tradersnarrative.com/dont-buy-what-wall-street-sells-349.html#comment-186 Of course GLD ran above $70 in May, so.... But the timing of the Silver ETF is most (un)fortunate. ;-) BTW I've transferred the original <a href="http://maoxian.com/archive/perfect-timing/" rel="nofollow">Ducks Quack</a> post from the old site to WordPress. Of course GLD ran above $70 in May, so…. But the timing of the Silver ETF is most (un)fortunate. ;-)

BTW I’ve transferred the original Ducks Quack post from the old site to WordPress.

]]>