<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fade Hysteria and Idiots Who Fan Its Flames</title>
	<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/fade-hysteria-and-idiots-who-fan-its-flames-710.html</link>
	<description>Freshly squeezed market commentary &#038; analysis</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Percentage of Nasdaq Stocks Above 200 Day Moving Average</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/fade-hysteria-and-idiots-who-fan-its-flames-710.html#comment-27459</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 01:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/fade-hysteria-and-idiots-who-fan-its-flames-710.html#comment-27459</guid>
					<description>[...] That&amp;#8217;s notable because digg occupies itself usually with technology and science news. The stock market and the economy rarely make it to the front page. When they do, it is sensationalist headlines like those above&amp;#8230; which makes for great a contrarian indicator. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] That&#8217;s notable because digg occupies itself usually with technology and science news. The stock market and the economy rarely make it to the front page. When they do, it is sensationalist headlines like those above&#8230; which makes for great a contrarian indicator. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: So This Is What Charred Bear Smells Like at Trader&#8217;s Narrative</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/fade-hysteria-and-idiots-who-fan-its-flames-710.html#comment-4802</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 00:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/fade-hysteria-and-idiots-who-fan-its-flames-710.html#comment-4802</guid>
					<description>[...] I can atleast take solace that my bullish bias was vindicated. And I think it&amp;#8217;s safe to say this was a 90-90 day, as per Lowry&amp;#8217;s definition. This reminds me of what happened last summer and what I wrote then. If you listened, you made some ching. If not, there is this opportunity now. Take a look at the breadth numbers for today: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I can atleast take solace that my bullish bias was vindicated. And I think it&#8217;s safe to say this was a 90-90 day, as per Lowry&#8217;s definition. This reminds me of what happened last summer and what I wrote then. If you listened, you made some ching. If not, there is this opportunity now. Take a look at the breadth numbers for today: [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Smart Bear Market Investing at Trader&#8217;s Narrative</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/fade-hysteria-and-idiots-who-fan-its-flames-710.html#comment-4750</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 00:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/fade-hysteria-and-idiots-who-fan-its-flames-710.html#comment-4750</guid>
					<description>[...] Another notch for the sentiment picture. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Another notch for the sentiment picture. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
