<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How To Checkmate McCain&#8217;s VP Choice In Sarah Palin</title>
	<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/how-to-checkmate-mccains-vp-choice-in-sarah-palin-1803.html</link>
	<description>Freshly squeezed market commentary &#038; analysis</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 21:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/how-to-checkmate-mccains-vp-choice-in-sarah-palin-1803.html#comment-34784</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 19:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/how-to-checkmate-mccains-vp-choice-in-sarah-palin-1803.html#comment-34784</guid>
					<description>a lot of convenient amnesia about the Bush Doctrine!
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/09/14/bush_doctrine/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a lot of convenient amnesia about the Bush Doctrine!<br />
<a href='http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/09/14/bush_doctrine/' rel='nofollow'>http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/09/14/bush_doctrine/</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: martin</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/how-to-checkmate-mccains-vp-choice-in-sarah-palin-1803.html#comment-34779</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 12:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/how-to-checkmate-mccains-vp-choice-in-sarah-palin-1803.html#comment-34779</guid>
					<description>&quot;Bush doctrine?&quot; &quot;Bush shmoctrin!&quot;   Obamahammer nails &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/09/charlie_gibsons_gaffe.html&quot;&gt;it here&lt;/a&gt;.  Read it and weep! and then &lt;a href=&quot;http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MzJlNDRlYjY0OWMzMjRjYWU4MTM4NjhkY2E5NmExNDU=&quot;&gt;move on.&lt;/a&gt;.. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Bush doctrine?&#8221; &#8220;Bush shmoctrin!&#8221;   Obamahammer nails <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/09/charlie_gibsons_gaffe.html">it here</a>.  Read it and weep! and then <a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MzJlNDRlYjY0OWMzMjRjYWU4MTM4NjhkY2E5NmExNDU=">move on.</a>..
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/how-to-checkmate-mccains-vp-choice-in-sarah-palin-1803.html#comment-34777</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 04:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/how-to-checkmate-mccains-vp-choice-in-sarah-palin-1803.html#comment-34777</guid>
					<description>Mr. Babak:

You wrote: &quot;...wants people to leave her unwed pregnant daughter alone, but who wants to make it illegal for other people’s daughter to make their own choices about their bodies,...&quot;

It's NOT about the pregnant woman's body, sir. It is about another human being's body, perhaps another human being of a different gender, or of the same gender with a different blood type. If you have the courage of your convictions then you won't mind viewing physical evidence which proves my point. Check it out. And then consider the Golden Rule and how it applies here. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Babak:</p>
<p>You wrote: &#8220;&#8230;wants people to leave her unwed pregnant daughter alone, but who wants to make it illegal for other people’s daughter to make their own choices about their bodies,&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s NOT about the pregnant woman&#8217;s body, sir. It is about another human being&#8217;s body, perhaps another human being of a different gender, or of the same gender with a different blood type. If you have the courage of your convictions then you won&#8217;t mind viewing physical evidence which proves my point. Check it out. And then consider the Golden Rule and how it applies here.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Babak</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/how-to-checkmate-mccains-vp-choice-in-sarah-palin-1803.html#comment-34773</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 19:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/how-to-checkmate-mccains-vp-choice-in-sarah-palin-1803.html#comment-34773</guid>
					<description>scood, thanks... I think... LoL Canadians aren't perfect but we're pretty close! If the US election were being held over here, Obama would have already won (about 12 months ago). 

martin, &quot;an excellent VP&quot;... who doesn't even know what the &quot;Bush doctrine&quot; is! who wants people to leave her unwed pregnant daughter alone, but who wants to make it illegal for other people's daughter to make their own choices about their bodies, who lies about her support for the bridge to nowhere, who requested more pork-barrel earmark spending per capital for her state than any other state, but now wants you to believe she is a champion of &quot;change&quot;... LoL

watch the movie &quot;Idiocracy&quot; - that's a documentary of the US filmed decades in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>scood, thanks&#8230; I think&#8230; LoL Canadians aren&#8217;t perfect but we&#8217;re pretty close! If the US election were being held over here, Obama would have already won (about 12 months ago). </p>
<p>martin, &#8220;an excellent VP&#8221;&#8230; who doesn&#8217;t even know what the &#8220;Bush doctrine&#8221; is! who wants people to leave her unwed pregnant daughter alone, but who wants to make it illegal for other people&#8217;s daughter to make their own choices about their bodies, who lies about her support for the bridge to nowhere, who requested more pork-barrel earmark spending per capital for her state than any other state, but now wants you to believe she is a champion of &#8220;change&#8221;&#8230; LoL</p>
<p>watch the movie &#8220;Idiocracy&#8221; - that&#8217;s a documentary of the US filmed decades in the future.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: martin</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/how-to-checkmate-mccains-vp-choice-in-sarah-palin-1803.html#comment-34772</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 17:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/how-to-checkmate-mccains-vp-choice-in-sarah-palin-1803.html#comment-34772</guid>
					<description>&quot;Here is an easy way for the Democrats to checkmate Rove’s move: Have Hillary Clinton rip Sarah Palin apart.&quot; Hey! what a great idea. The problem is that Hillary hates and detests Obama because everybody knows he stole the Dem nomination from her. Why should she help him when the smart move is to wait for another four years. McCain's response to the Dem civil war is so brilliant that Obama's fatal hubris will be remembered in political studies for decades to come. The bonus for McCain (and the USA) is that Sarah Palin has all the makings of being an excellent VP and maybe one day CIC. Gary, face it, your hero has blown it! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qwwaIqC-aeE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Here is an easy way for the Democrats to checkmate Rove’s move: Have Hillary Clinton rip Sarah Palin apart.&#8221; Hey! what a great idea. The problem is that Hillary hates and detests Obama because everybody knows he stole the Dem nomination from her. Why should she help him when the smart move is to wait for another four years. McCain&#8217;s response to the Dem civil war is so brilliant that Obama&#8217;s fatal hubris will be remembered in political studies for decades to come. The bonus for McCain (and the USA) is that Sarah Palin has all the makings of being an excellent VP and maybe one day CIC. Gary, face it, your hero has blown it! <a href='http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qwwaIqC-aeE' rel='nofollow'>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qwwaIqC-aeE</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: scood</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/how-to-checkmate-mccains-vp-choice-in-sarah-palin-1803.html#comment-34720</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/how-to-checkmate-mccains-vp-choice-in-sarah-palin-1803.html#comment-34720</guid>
					<description>Awww cm'on, Canadians were always elitist snobs. Why do you think they sided w/KingGeorgie in the American Revolution? But the Mounties always doo-right....right? Cept &quot;right&quot; seems to get more and more complicated, just like mkt prognostifying. Maybe even a deep and intelligent knowledge of the texts is not enuf to keep us on the right side of disaster, especially since we often confuse articulatness w/brilliance.
But I can tell you, being a Tico in my 2nd life, that Canadians are 1st rate and elite snobism is just one of their endearing qualities. Cm'on, who'd you root for Dudley Do-Right or Snidely Whiplash?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awww cm&#8217;on, Canadians were always elitist snobs. Why do you think they sided w/KingGeorgie in the American Revolution? But the Mounties always doo-right&#8230;.right? Cept &#8220;right&#8221; seems to get more and more complicated, just like mkt prognostifying. Maybe even a deep and intelligent knowledge of the texts is not enuf to keep us on the right side of disaster, especially since we often confuse articulatness w/brilliance.<br />
But I can tell you, being a Tico in my 2nd life, that Canadians are 1st rate and elite snobism is just one of their endearing qualities. Cm&#8217;on, who&#8217;d you root for Dudley Do-Right or Snidely Whiplash?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The BoBo Carnival of Politics Sep 7, 2008 &#124; The BoBo Files</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/how-to-checkmate-mccains-vp-choice-in-sarah-palin-1803.html#comment-34717</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 15:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/how-to-checkmate-mccains-vp-choice-in-sarah-palin-1803.html#comment-34717</guid>
					<description>[...] Babak presents How To Checkmate McCain’s VP Choice In Sarah Palin posted at Trader&amp;#8217;s Narrative. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Babak presents How To Checkmate McCain’s VP Choice In Sarah Palin posted at Trader&#8217;s Narrative. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/how-to-checkmate-mccains-vp-choice-in-sarah-palin-1803.html#comment-34706</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 19:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/how-to-checkmate-mccains-vp-choice-in-sarah-palin-1803.html#comment-34706</guid>
					<description>you've got to see this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SwwO00aWqM

this is why he's the man!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you&#8217;ve got to see this:<br />
<a href='http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SwwO00aWqM' rel='nofollow'>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SwwO00aWqM</a></p>
<p>this is why he&#8217;s the man!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/how-to-checkmate-mccains-vp-choice-in-sarah-palin-1803.html#comment-34701</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 06:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/how-to-checkmate-mccains-vp-choice-in-sarah-palin-1803.html#comment-34701</guid>
					<description>wow, very prescient Babak, the NYT has this:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/05/us/politics/05dems.html?emc=tnt&amp;#38;tntemail1=y</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow, very prescient Babak, the NYT has this:<br />
<a href='http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/05/us/politics/05dems.html?emc=tnt&amp;tntemail1=y' rel='nofollow'>http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/05/us/politics/05dems.html?emc=tnt&amp;tntemail1=y</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/how-to-checkmate-mccains-vp-choice-in-sarah-palin-1803.html#comment-34682</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 01:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/how-to-checkmate-mccains-vp-choice-in-sarah-palin-1803.html#comment-34682</guid>
					<description>Dear Tom:

I guess that &quot;is&quot; depends on how you define &quot;is&quot;.
I use Websters; Leftists just make it up as the situation requires. So who is full of hyperbole here? It ain't me.
And yes, I have long since read Wikipedia's section on Barack Obama, and a lot more on Barack Obama. The one sentence I overlooked is reproduced below.

If Wikipedia is properly vetted (for sake of avoiding argument I will assume that the information is correct)then you made an outstanding point, for according to Wikipedia: &quot;In 1993 Obama joined Davis, Miner, Barnhill &amp;#38; Galland, a 12-attorney law firm specializing in civil rights litigation and neighborhood economic development, where he was an associate for three years from 1993 to 1996...&quot; So it appears that for a period of three years he had a &quot;real-world&quot; job. HOWEVER, it would be interesting to know how this law firm made its money, that is, from personal and corporate clients who actually had to EARN that money in the competitive marketplace, or from grants and contracts with public entities of one sort or another who do NOT have to compete in the private (real-world) economy but are funded through donations and/or tax dollars taken from Americans who had to earn them in the marketplace. 
THAT is what I mean by a &quot;real-world&quot; job. You have to compete in the open marketplace: meet a payroll, produce a competitive product, attain sales goals, CONTROL COSTS (unheard of in our Federal Government, but REQUIRED of State governments, like Alaska), et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. NOT spend your life working for public entities of one type or another that exist outside that marketplace by confiscating the earnings of others who have to exist IN that marketplace. I hope I cleared that up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Tom:</p>
<p>I guess that &#8220;is&#8221; depends on how you define &#8220;is&#8221;.<br />
I use Websters; Leftists just make it up as the situation requires. So who is full of hyperbole here? It ain&#8217;t me.<br />
And yes, I have long since read Wikipedia&#8217;s section on Barack Obama, and a lot more on Barack Obama. The one sentence I overlooked is reproduced below.</p>
<p>If Wikipedia is properly vetted (for sake of avoiding argument I will assume that the information is correct)then you made an outstanding point, for according to Wikipedia: &#8220;In 1993 Obama joined Davis, Miner, Barnhill &amp; Galland, a 12-attorney law firm specializing in civil rights litigation and neighborhood economic development, where he was an associate for three years from 1993 to 1996&#8230;&#8221; So it appears that for a period of three years he had a &#8220;real-world&#8221; job. HOWEVER, it would be interesting to know how this law firm made its money, that is, from personal and corporate clients who actually had to EARN that money in the competitive marketplace, or from grants and contracts with public entities of one sort or another who do NOT have to compete in the private (real-world) economy but are funded through donations and/or tax dollars taken from Americans who had to earn them in the marketplace.<br />
THAT is what I mean by a &#8220;real-world&#8221; job. You have to compete in the open marketplace: meet a payroll, produce a competitive product, attain sales goals, CONTROL COSTS (unheard of in our Federal Government, but REQUIRED of State governments, like Alaska), et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. NOT spend your life working for public entities of one type or another that exist outside that marketplace by confiscating the earnings of others who have to exist IN that marketplace. I hope I cleared that up.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
