<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IBES Valuation Model: Stocks Ridiculously Undervalued</title>
	<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/ibes-valuation-model-stocks-ridiculously-undervalued-630.html</link>
	<description>Freshly squeezed market commentary &#038; analysis</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 00:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Babak</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/ibes-valuation-model-stocks-ridiculously-undervalued-630.html#comment-31479</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 01:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/ibes-valuation-model-stocks-ridiculously-undervalued-630.html#comment-31479</guid>
					<description>Yeah, I see your point now. It is a bit of a conundrum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I see your point now. It is a bit of a conundrum.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/ibes-valuation-model-stocks-ridiculously-undervalued-630.html#comment-31478</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/ibes-valuation-model-stocks-ridiculously-undervalued-630.html#comment-31478</guid>
					<description>Mark has a point that is subtly made, but perhaps too subtly for some.
The point is that the usefulness (or rather lack thereof) of a chart that shows stocks to have been extrememly undervalued for five whole years is something that beggars belief.
Next.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark has a point that is subtly made, but perhaps too subtly for some.<br />
The point is that the usefulness (or rather lack thereof) of a chart that shows stocks to have been extrememly undervalued for five whole years is something that beggars belief.<br />
Next.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dow Jones Technical &#38; Fundamental Analysis</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/ibes-valuation-model-stocks-ridiculously-undervalued-630.html#comment-31167</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 19:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/ibes-valuation-model-stocks-ridiculously-undervalued-630.html#comment-31167</guid>
					<description>[...] I&amp;#8217;m not big on fundamental analysis but when it dovetails so neatly with technical analysis, I can&amp;#8217;t help but take notice. Oh and for another take on the general market fundamentals, take a look at the IBES model. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I&#8217;m not big on fundamental analysis but when it dovetails so neatly with technical analysis, I can&#8217;t help but take notice. Oh and for another take on the general market fundamentals, take a look at the IBES model. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: carnival of personal finance: photo quiz edition : plonkee money</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/ibes-valuation-model-stocks-ridiculously-undervalued-630.html#comment-26797</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 10:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/ibes-valuation-model-stocks-ridiculously-undervalued-630.html#comment-26797</guid>
					<description>[...] Babak from Trader&amp;#8217;s Narrative presents IBES Valuation Model: Stocks Ridiculously Undervalued .Erm. Do your own research? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Babak from Trader&#8217;s Narrative presents IBES Valuation Model: Stocks Ridiculously Undervalued .Erm. Do your own research? [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Babak</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/ibes-valuation-model-stocks-ridiculously-undervalued-630.html#comment-26689</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 05:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/ibes-valuation-model-stocks-ridiculously-undervalued-630.html#comment-26689</guid>
					<description>umagumm, so you think in 1999/2000 stocks were undervalued?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>umagumm, so you think in 1999/2000 stocks were undervalued?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: umagumm</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/ibes-valuation-model-stocks-ridiculously-undervalued-630.html#comment-26680</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 02:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/ibes-valuation-model-stocks-ridiculously-undervalued-630.html#comment-26680</guid>
					<description>I like the the graph better upside down</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the the graph better upside down
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Babak</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/ibes-valuation-model-stocks-ridiculously-undervalued-630.html#comment-26668</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/ibes-valuation-model-stocks-ridiculously-undervalued-630.html#comment-26668</guid>
					<description>Mark, perhaps the last time it got stuck in an extreme reading may hold a clue.

Gerg, not really. The earnings estimates are the numerator and they change so there's an interplay between them and the bond rates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, perhaps the last time it got stuck in an extreme reading may hold a clue.</p>
<p>Gerg, not really. The earnings estimates are the numerator and they change so there&#8217;s an interplay between them and the bond rates.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Gerg</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/ibes-valuation-model-stocks-ridiculously-undervalued-630.html#comment-26629</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 22:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/ibes-valuation-model-stocks-ridiculously-undervalued-630.html#comment-26629</guid>
					<description>So, couldn't that graph be equally labelled &quot;Bond valuation&quot; with &quot;Overvalued&quot; and &quot;Undervalued&quot; be swapped?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, couldn&#8217;t that graph be equally labelled &#8220;Bond valuation&#8221; with &#8220;Overvalued&#8221; and &#8220;Undervalued&#8221; be swapped?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mark Lamb</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/ibes-valuation-model-stocks-ridiculously-undervalued-630.html#comment-26610</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/ibes-valuation-model-stocks-ridiculously-undervalued-630.html#comment-26610</guid>
					<description>In your opinion why has this model's reading &quot;extremely undervalued&quot; for almost 5 straight years?
Thank You...Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In your opinion why has this model&#8217;s reading &#8220;extremely undervalued&#8221; for almost 5 straight years?<br />
Thank You&#8230;Mark
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
