Trader’s Narrative

Guest Post by Nico Isaac

The following article includes analysis from Robert Prechter’s Elliott Wave Theorist. For more insights from Robert Prechter, download the 75-page eBook Independent Investor eBook. It’s a compilation of some of the New York Times bestselling author’s writings that challenge conventional financial market assumptions. Visit Elliott Wave International to download the eBook, free.

Once upon a time, the term “Black Monday” was to Wall Street what the name “Lord Voldemort” was to Hogwarts. It turned the air freezing cold and sent traders flinching around every corner in fear of a repeat of the October 19, 1987 or October 28, 1929 meltdown.

Case in point: The 2008 “Black Monday” anniversary. At the time, the U.S. stock market was locked in a ferocious downtrend that included regular, triple-digit daily declines of 400 points and more. Needless to say, when the final two Mondays of October arrived, the least superstitious investors surrounded their portfolios with more good-luck talismans than a Bingo player. See October 19, 2008 AP headline below:

“Black Monday: Stocks Sink As Gloom Seizes Wall Street. Prolonged Economic Turmoil” is seen.

That was then. Today, the usual dread surrounding the back-to-back string of “Black Mondays” is nowhere to be found. In its place, media reports abound of a new, global bull market “shrugging off,” “ignoring,” and “making a distant memory” of the event.

For one, “gloom” hasn’t “seized” the U.S. stock market in quite a while; from its March 2009 low, the Dow has risen more than 50% to above the psychologically important 10,000 level. For another, the mainstream experts insist that today’s financial animal is unrecognizable to that of 1987, and especially 1929. In their eyes, it’s a completely different — i.e. safer, smarter, and sounder system.

We beg to differ.

See, while the usual experts want to put as much mental distance between today’s market and those that facilitated the 1987 recession and 1929-1932 Great Depression — the physical similarities are impossible to ignore; more so, in fact, to the latter scenario.

Here, the October 2009 Elliott Wave Financial Forecast presents the following news clip from the October 25, 1929 New York Daily Investment News.

Now, take a look at these headlines from the week of October 12-17, 2009:

“The Great Recession Is Over.” (Reuters)

“80% of Economists Say The Worst Is Behind Us.” (CNN Money)

“The Bull Is Back” (AP)

“The Economic Recovery Is Well Underway” (Wall Street Journal)

They’re interchangeable — Eighty years later.

Along with a similar extreme in bullish sentiment, the performance of stocks between now and the 1929 situation is cut from the same cloth. After an initial plunge from August 1929 through late October 1929, the US stock market enjoyed a powerful rally well into the following year. NOW: After a steep freefall from its October 2007 peak, the US stock market is once again enjoying the fruits of a powerful rally back to new highs for the year.

Also, on closer examination, the October 19 Elliott Wave Theorist (EWT) uncovers an even deeper parallel between the 2009 rally and the 1929-30 one. Here, EWT presents the following snapshot of the Dow during the Depression-era advance:

As Bob Prechter points out — in 1930, stocks rallied to the level of the preceding year’s gap. Bob then reveals that the same level has been reached now.

So, we all know how the 1930 rally ended. The question is whether the 2009 advance will experience the same fate. As Bob explains in the Theorist, the only way to know for certain is to “look at the reality of the situation.”

For more information, download Robert Prechter’s free Independent Investor eBook. The 75-page resource teaches investors to think independently by challenging conventional financial market assumptions.

Let’s face it, this market has been driven by technicals not by any real fundamental health. So what happens when the same folks leave and take their rationale with them, fundamental investors may not be as keen to support the bids.

The recent softening in bids shouldn’t be a surprise. On October 15th the S&P 500 briefly traded 20.81% above its long term moving average. Now, it is only 14% above it. It was back on September 16th that the S&P 500 index first reached the 20% Maginot Line. Between then and now we had 4 other instances where price briefly pierced minutely above the 20% barrier only to be pushed back. Compared to historical precedence, this is part for the course.

As I presented in the detailed historical research report (What Happens This Far Above The 200 Moving Average?), usually when price moves this much away from its long term trend it has been unable to continue at the same pace. That’s what we’re seeing today as the S&P 500 is now below where it was trading on September 16th.

In this short video you can see the headwinds arrayed against the S&P 500. Both by the breaking of the uptrend line from March 2009 and the approaching downtrend line from the top of the bear market (October 2007):

One of the most important sectors, the Philadelphia Banking Index (BKX) has broken this uptrend line. We are also seeing some serious breadth (advance decline) weakness which is never really good but especially bad news while the market is so near a top.

Two institutional money managers have turned negative on the market recently. Jeremy Grantham of GMO Partners and Bill Gross of PIMCO. Click here for details on Grantham’s reasoning and to download his full quarterly report. Gross goes further than Grantham saying: “almost all assets appear to be overvalued on a long-term basis”. You can read his full commentary here.

For those who like to look at fundamental data like the quaint P/E ratio, here is a very long term chart, courtesy of Prof. Shiller:

As you can see, a lot of air was let out of the bubble. But, to mix metaphors, the pendulum didn’t swing back enough. During previous important market lows, the P/E ratio has fallen to much humbler depths. Thanks to the 60% rally from the March lows, we are once again back above the long term average. Which is unsettling, especially when you remember that Shiller uses a 10 year smoothing of the earnings data to iron out short term noise.

October’s P/E earnings, according to Shiller’s methodology is about 20 - well above the long term historical average of 16. Normally, a P/E ratio of 20 corresponds to economic expansion in its 5th year, not a major recession like the one we’re experiencing now. So understandably, Prof. Shiller is skeptical of the recovery in the equity market making the inevitable comparison to the aftermath of the 1929 crash and saying that “it can’t be trusted to continue”.

And turning our attention momentarily to the options markets, the equity only ISE sentiment index came in today at 191. Which means that while the equity market had a negative day with red all over the monitor, retail option traders tenaciously clung to hope and bought almost twice as many calls.

And if all that wasn’t spooky enough for you, to coincide with Halloween this year we have the 80th anniversary of the Great Crash of 1929. Boo!

No, there is no free lunch. But for my US readers, there is a free trading magazine subscription in their future.. For a limited time, you can get a complimentary subscription to SFO magazine (Stocks, Futures, and Options).

It takes less than a minute to sign up and you need to provide some basic information. But as I mentioned, you need to be a resident of the US (because you need to provide a US address). Enjoy!

Last week we took a look at a recent research report from Morgan Stanley on the aftermath of secular bear markets. Although in that article I featured this chart comparing the Nasdaq market from its peak in 2000 to now with the infamous Dow Jones Industrial index top in 1929, it deserves another mention. You can click on the graph to see it in full size:

I’m always fascinated by the fractal nature of the stock market. But I’m not convinced this isn’t just a random coincidence. Here’s another chart from Bloomberg comparing the S&P 500 with the Nikkei:

Again, an uncanny similarity. Again and again, markets seem to follow the same script. Or rather, the individual participants act with synchronous precision to create and unravel manias.

Another interesting comparison I mentioned a while ago is this year’s spring rally in the S&P 500 with that 6 years ago: Comparing Flag Formations: Then & Now. But where we part company from the past is when we look at the magnitude of this most recent rally.

This surge has offered no real opportunities for those who hesitated at its inception and waited for a pull back. In fact, the rally from the March 2009 lows has been the sharpest we’ve had in 40+ years:

If you consider each rally chronologically, something becomes noticeable: with the exception of the 1982 example, each subsequent bull market rally has been slightly sharper than the previous one. Maybe there is a pattern there. But it is hard to statistically defend since the observable sample is so small.

While the stock market has perked up slightly, the economy continues to be mired in a deep recession. Unemployment, housing and other measures are still negative with no real sign of improvement.

Since 1900, there have been 22 recessions which works out to one about every 5 years. While recessions are labeled officially by the NBER, in January 2008 I pointed to a specific indicator which I believed meant that we were in a recession (by late 2007). A while later, this was confirmed by NBER.

Here’s a chart of all US recessions since 1900 and their length:

Source: Chart of the Day (using data from the National Bureau of Economic Research)

The outlier, of course, is 1929. The G-20 leaders huddled together in London to do everything to keep it an outlier and prevent an equally devastating world-wide depression..

At the start of the century there was a cluster of long recessions. These 5 recessions all happened before 1930 and were also the longest in length. The next 70+ years saw much shorter recessions.

Although you may think this was due to the institution of the Federal Reserve and its role in managing the economy, you’d be wrong. The Fed was created in December 23th, 1913. It was the SEC that came about as a result of the chaotic aftermath of the 1929 crash and ensuing depression.

Here’s a chart showing the relationship between the unemployment rate and the stock market during the past few recessions. Notice how the “bad news” of a rising unemployment rate accompanies a rising stock market. In other words, the market discounts the future and starts to rally well ahead of the turning point in the economy.