Trader’s Narrative

This week the sentiment data brings a very intriguing turn of events so let’s get started:

Sentiment Surveys
The star this week is the ever so humble and common AAII weekly survey of US retail investors. This sentiment indicator sends extreme signals every once in a blue moon. So I guess you better check the night sky tonight because we haven’t seen so few bulls in this survey in a long time.

This week’s AAII results show only 22% bulls and a whopping 56% bears. The last time we saw this few optimists and this many pessimists was the week of February 19th 2009. Just before the spring rally. To put that in (even more) perspective, out of all the data that we have so far, only 4% of the time have there been less bulls.

Here is a chart of the bull ratio (bulls divided by the total number of bulls & bears):

I’ve zoomed in to the past 7 years or so since showing the whole time series from 1987 would be overkill. From 2002 till now, there have been 8 instances where the AAII bull ratio was less than 30%. But as the last extreme reading in February suggests, it is best to not act in haste when presented with such a scrumptious contrarian gift. Historical data suggests that sitting on your hands for the next few weeks is the most prudent strategy (for longs).

I hope that I haven’t understated the gravity of this week’s AAII sentiment survey result because there is a high probability that it will once again prove to be prescient in pinpointing an upcoming inflection point. It is most definitely a tell that after a 55% rally we find the AAII bull ratio at such an extreme low when in early 2004 after a 37% rally from the 2003 lows the bull ratio was at the other extreme (see above chart).

The one puzzling thing is that the AAII asset allocation survey shows a slight uptick in equities (to 57%) while back in February when the bull ratio was so low last, it was closer to 40%. I guess the message the AAII folks are sending is that they like equities longer term but short term they’re very nervous. And that’s remarkable because of how little off we are from the year’s highs.

Investors Intelligence
While this week the AAII deservedly monopolized our attention, the measure of newsletter sentiment from ChartCraft is a snoozefest. The II this week is almost completely unchanged with 48.3% bears and 24.7% bears for a (yet again) bear to bull ratio of 2:1. I’m not sure how to reconcile these two disparate metrics but I do know that this is really nothing new as they often conflict with one another.

Hulbert Newsletter Sentiment
Thankfully, we have another measure of newsletter sentiment. Currently, the Hulbert Stock Newsletter Sentiment Index (HSNSI) stands at 3.2% - which implies that the average recommended exposure by short term timing newsletters is to be long 3.2% of their client’s portfolio.
Continue reading ‘Sentiment Overview: Week Of November 6th, 2009′

Here are this week’s sentiment cross currents:

Investors Intelligence
The measure of stock market newsletter editors sentiment published by ChartCraft shows 36.0% as bullish and as 37.2% bearish. This is a reversal of the previous two weeks where we had seen the bulls outnumber the bears. It is difficult to dismiss the rapid increase in bullishness we’ve seen since the March lows as a hallmark of bear market rallies since we’ve seen the same II pattern in previous new bull markets.

American Association of Individual Investors
The sentiment survey of retail investors shows a reduction in number that were unsure from 29% to 20%. The 9% increase in conviction was almost equally apportioned, with 36% bullish and 44% bearish.

Perhaps more meaningful is the asset allocation of the AAII. They have a paltry 41% of their portfolios dedicated to equities. This is the lowest in the history of the survey (going back to 1988). It is slightly lower than what we saw on previous long term market bottoms: early 1991 and late 2002. As well, to highlight the insecurity the average American retail investor is feeling, they have pushed their cash allocation all the way to 45%. Not only is this an all time high it is the first time that the size of cash in portfolios has trumped equities.

Hulbert Newsletter Sentiment
Since the March lows, the HSNSI has jumped by more than 45% points. While some increase in optimism is warranted in a new bull market, this much of an increase is atypical of the historical playbook. During the first 52 days of the average bull market since 1965, the stock newsletter editors that time the market have on average only increased their bullishness 29.3% points. You can read more about Mark Hulbert’s recent research into the pattern of sentiment in new bull markets. This was featured a few days ago at news.tradersnarrative.com where you can find a continuous stream of interesting articles.

Option Sentiment
Nothing really new in this area, see previous week’s sentiment overview for further details. That discussion is still valid.

Sell In May And Go Away
You know the old Wall St. adage, “Sell in May and go away”. Well, here we are. We have now officially entered the time period which has historically been most difficult for the stock market.

So far we’ve had a tremendous rally off the March lows: the S&P 500 index gained 28.4% and for the two months of March and April, it has risen 25% with most of it coming from March. April’s gain was 8.2%

Looking at market cycles, this is rare. To see such a similar strong performance for the months of March and April we would have to go back to the 1930’s where intense bear market rallies were the norm. In those times, it wasn’t a good time to put fresh money to work (hence the label of bear market rallies and the annual cyclical nature of returns).

Big Money Poll
Last weekend brought out Barron’s quarterly Big Money poll. The small group of strategists surveyed were decidedly optimistic with 59% stating they were either bullish or very bullish. While a surprising 58% stated that they didn’t believe the market had bottomed yet, almost the same percentage (59%) identified the stock market as the best asset class for the next 6 to 12 months going forward. I’ll leave you to ponder the riddle of their logic.

The problem with the Big Money poll is that in its history, as a group, it has never been truly bearish. So while we would like to use it as a contrarian measure, we really can’t because for the most part it has no edge.

Drilling down into the sectors, the most unloved were Transportation and Utilities. In contrast, the Big Money poll liked corporate bonds, emerging markets (Latin America & Asia) and oil. But the one thing they almost all agreed on (84%) was to be bearish on US treasuries. This is puzzling since they’ve been persistently bearish on bonds for the past 8 years in the face of a powerful bull market in that asset class - especially in 2008.

Wall St. Strategists
The insistent bearish stance of the Big Money poll participants is in contrast to the current recommended allocation by the average Wall St. strategist. Right now they’ve peaked at a suggestion of 38.9% of client portfolios to (US long term) bonds, which is the highest in 12+ years. The last time they were even close to this level was in 1998 (34% allocation) when bonds topped and didn’t regain their previous high for another 3 years.

The asset class garnering the highest allocation is equities with a 52% weighing. Similar to the Big Money poll, Wall St. strategists are never outright bearish. Their bullishness is either raging or reluctant. So put in that proper context, the current allocation is very timid. It is the lowest allocation to equities since 1997. And during the bear market bottom of 2002-2003, their equity allocation was 68%.

Free Access to EWI
There has been such a crushing demand for the FREE 120 page report from Elliott Wave International that they’ve extended the offer for a few extra days. It is a mini-book covering the US, European and Asian markets as well as interest rates, commodities, currencies and much more. This is the most recent edition of their comprehensive Global Market Perspective and is exactly what their regular paying clients receive (except they pay $199 and you’re getting it free). But it is only available free for just a few more days. There’s no obligation to purchase anything and you only need your email. I’ll go over it shortly on the blog so download your copy now.

Free Traders Magazine Subscription
Get a FREE subscription to Traders magazine. Take advantage of this offer right now because it will expire very soon.

Traders magazine informs the professional buy side and sell side trader about the evolving market structures. It covers trends on market making, globalization, block trading, technology, electronic trading, inter-dealer trading, soft dollars, electronic communications networks and all technology that impacts the trading community.

On a grand scale, you could argue that the level of the stock market is set by two forces: the supply of ‘paper’, which comes from initial public offerings (IPOs), secondaries and other corporate actions, and on the other side, the demand of stocks which is not only influenced by the sentiment of investors but also by valuation and perhaps most importantly, by the supply of money in the economy.

The amount of money sloshing around the economy matters because eventually it has to find a home. In the past decade we’ve seen it rush into two markets, causing sequential bubbles in tech stocks and real estate.

One way to look at the relationship is to chart the change in change of money supply and see how it corresponds to the market and the economy. The chart below shows 35+ years of monthly data but before you can make sense of it, some explanation is needed:

Data: St. Louis Fed (FRED database)

M2 is a widely used measure of the money supply but since inflationary and deflationary periods can warp it, we look at inflation adjusted M2 (using CPI numbers). This gives us ‘real’ M2 which is more useful to compare across time. But we also have to account for the number of people in the economy because everything else being equal, on average, the more people we have the more money is used by them. So we divide the real M2 by the estimated monthly US population to get per capita, ‘real’ M2.

Then finally, we are interested in the annual rate of change that occurs in the real per capita M2 money supply, which gives us the chart you see.

The middle line represents zero, so anything above that means that the rate of change in money supply is positive and the Fed is pumping money into the economy (and vice versa). Obviously, the more extreme the move and the more the line stays above the 7 year moving average, the more significant it is.

From the latest data available (January 2009), the annual rate of change is higher than it has ever been - even higher than the early 1980’s. This means that eventually, as it works its way through the economy, there will be more and more money chasing fewer shares, driving up the level of the stock market.

Credit for this measure comes from an article by Norman P. Poiré, published in Barron’s on August 28th, 2000. If you aren’t a subscriber, you can read the article on Poiré’s website.

If that a head and shoulder pattern, or a symmetrical triangle? Will Keynes ghost save us? Why did John get all the brains (and hair) in the Paulson family?

To find out, take a look at this weekend’s reading list from news.tradersnarrative.com:

• Still no clues of a bottom for stocks
• From GMO: Grantham’s latest letter to clients
• Peter Schiff on the defense about his performance
• As January goes, so goes the year?
• The new financial bubble
• John Paulson lives up to the name “hedge fund”
• The power of high dividend stocks
• JP Morgan quietly exited Madoff funds
• Historical chart of the IPO maket

And remember to check regularly since there are interesting links added regularly throughout the week.

Alright, so we have our change. But what’s after change? what’s comes after hope? Is it safe to venture out to put the pieces together again?

To find out, take a look at this weekend’s reading list from news.tradersnarrative.com:

• Aftermath: Woe is us
• Using TICK to find inflections
• Why Peter Schiff’s stock is rising
• This bear market a pup compared to tech bubble
• What if zero interest rates are too high?
• Short fund up +100% faces redemptions
• Decline in progress
• What lipstick sales tell you…

And remember to check regularly since there are interesting links added regularly throughout the week.

Polish Those Crystal Balls