Trader’s Narrative

By Neil Beers

So Bob Prechter is bearish again.

That may be no surprise to some, but recall that Prechter was about the only bull on February 23 of this year when he covered the short position he had recommended on July 17, 2007. That was nearly two years later and 800 points lower in the S&P. And the Daily Sentiment Index (DSI) reading for the S&P had gotten down to only 3% bulls!

His February 2009 Elliott Wave Theorist explained, “The market is compressed, and when it finds a bottom and rallies, it will be sharp and scary for anyone who is short.” Elliott Wave analysis, the DSI, and other indicators suggested it was time for a Primary-degree bear market rally. And that is what we got.

Now in his August 2009 Theorist, Bob explains what “the prudent thing to do” in the markets is, based on the same Elliott wave pattern and sentiment indicators — plus the Dow’s 3/8 Fibonacci retracement from the March 9 low.

For more analysis from Robert Prechter, download a free 10-page July issue of Prechter’s Elliott Wave Theorist.

What’s so special about Fibonacci? And why is a certain level of Fibonacci retracement so significant in conjunction with The Wave Principle? Well…

In its broadest sense, the Wave Principle suggests the idea that the same law [the Golden Ratio] that shapes living creatures and galaxies is inherent in the spirit and activities of men en masse. Because the stock market is the most meticulously tabulated reflector of mass psychology in the world, its data produce an excellent recording of man’s social psychological states and trends. This record of the fluctuating self-evaluation of social man’s own productive enterprise makes manifest specific patterns of progress and regress. What the Wave Principle says is that mankind’s progress (of which the stock market is a popularly determined valuation) does not occur in a straight line, does not occur randomly, and does not occur cyclically. Rather, progress takes place in a “three steps forward, two steps back” fashion, a form that nature prefers. More grandly, as the activity of social man is linked to the Fibonacci sequence and the spiral pattern of progression, it is apparently no exception to the general law of ordered growth in the universe. … The briefest way to express this principle is a simple mathematical statement: the 1.618 ratio.

Elliott Wave Principle, Chapter 3

Fibonacci ratios in conjunction with The Wave Principle can help you anticipate trend changes. They allow you to calculate specific price levels of when and where a wave is likely to end. In this case, where the rally from the March 9 low is likely to end. There are several Fibonacci retracements that appear most commonly, so the market could of course move higher before it settles on the next wave down, “but we are no longer compelled to wait.”

Bob Prechter’s August Elliott Wave Theorist published a week and a half early: he did so to give subscribers time to prepare for what’s ahead. The issue provides a list of levels that mark Fibonacci and Elliott-wave related retracements for the rally. He analyzes which one is the most likely end point, and even explains how you can make the most of the waning rally.

You don’t have to be taken by surprise. Get the latest Elliott Wave Theorist and you’ll see where the rally is likely to end. Think about the difference this knowledge can make for you.

For more analysis from Robert Prechter, download a FREE 10-page July issue of The Elliott Wave Theorist. It challenges current recovery hype with hard facts, independent analysis, and insightful charts. You’ll find out why the worst is NOT over and what you can do to safeguard your financial future.

Neil Beers has a bachelors degrees in political science and philosophy, and a masters in classical languages. His broad range of study and focus on ancient and modern thought led him to Elliott Wave International to research and write about the Wave Principle, Socionomics, and human social behavior.

It is Friday, time for this week’s sentiment summary:

Sentiment Surveys
The Association of American Individual Investors’ weekly sentiment survey had the bulls at 28% again (a decline of 10% points) and the bears increased by the same amount to 55%. This definitely moves sentiment towards real pessimism. The bull/bear ratio is almost equal to late February. But we aren’t quite at an extreme point - yet.

In contrast, there is not much excitement in the weekly Investors Intelligence survey as it is almost unchanged from last week. The optimists number 42.7% and the pessimists 30%.

ABC News/Washington Post Consumer Comfort Poll
Although the Reuters/University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment survey is the most popular measure of the economic mood of the average American, there are a few others. One of these is the ABC Newss/Washington Post Consumer Comfort Poll which has been conducted for almost 24 years, every week.

In contrast to the recent Reuters/Michigan Consumer data, this poll shows that US consumers are losing confidence. The past 3 weeks have it hovering at -50. In its entire history, it has only spent 14 weeks below -50 (with 8 out of those 14 occurring this year!). If this pace continues, it will be the worst year for this indicator yet.

Continue reading ‘Sentiment Overview: Week Of July 10th, 2009′

The first time we looked at the Credit Suisse Fear Barometer, it didn’t look like it had anything useful to offer. But using it in combination with its competitor, the VIX index, it may yield surprising insight into options sentiment and the stock market.

The VIX has declined from its stratospheric highs to reach close to its long term average of 20. That may suggest that there is little fear in the market. But that isn’t really accurate because right now traders are willing to pay more for put options than for (equivalent) call options. We can tell that because the CSFB is higher.

The last time we had a CS Fear Barometer rising while the CBOE volatility index was falling was in early May 2008 (shown above) - just before the S&P 500 rolled over into another waterfall decline.

Source: Battle Of The Fear Indexes

That is just one instance but the others also provide the same general idea. The S&P 500 has a very tough time on average, going up when the VIX has fallen and the CSFB has gone up.

So it seems the ugly duckling of an indicator has suddenly become a swan. When paired with the VIX, the CSFB seems to unfold even more meaning for the stock market.

Check out my original review of SentimenTrader.com to see why I highly recommend Jason’s insights. As you can see from the above analysis, he’s well worth your money.

Here is this week’s sentiment summary:

Sentiment Surveys
Figures from ChartCraft’s Investors Intelligence show stock newsletter editors to be similarly bullish to last week: 43.6% bullish and 28.7% bearish. Not only is this little changed from last week, it leaves us mired in a neutral morass which is not really helpful in determining a trend.

In contrast, the weekly AAII data is a bit more attention grabbing. As measured by the American Association of Individual Investors, the percentage of US retail investors who are bearish increased by 3% points to 49% and those who are bullish declined by 5% points to just 28%.

As you might recall, we saw a record setting AAII bearishness that coincided with the start of the spring rally. This week’s sentiment figures are the most pessimistic since then. While some would interpret this as bullish for the market, it may not be that simple.

While sentiment is helpful in pointing out inflection points at extremes, the rest of the time as it meanders it is either not really helpful at all. If you really want to analyze it, sentiment tends to go along with the trend in the market until it tips into a severely lopsided situation. So in fact, while we are not seeing extremes, sentiment can be seen as a guide to confirm a trend, rather than as a contrarian indicator. This is a distinction that makes sentiment much harder to analyze than merely zigging when it zags.

Therefore, since the AAII data isn’t at an extreme level of bearishness, we can’t really use it as a contrarian measure. All we can say is that fewer people are bullish, which means that less and less are feeling like putting money to work. That isn’t necessarily great news if you’re bullish.

Finally, the Hulbert Stock Newsletter Sentiment Index which is another measure of stock newsletter editor’s stance has fallen from 45.8% early in June 2009 to just 15.8% in recent days. Such a retreat confirms what we are seeing in the other sentiment data (above); bullishness is fading to varying degrees but it is not yet at a point of extreme. Mark Hulbert, the creator and keeper of this sentiment indicator, believes that such a move has contrarian portent because while sentiment has fallen to levels last seen in early April, the market is much higher.

Options Sentiment
The CBOE put call ratio’s short term moving average is climbing higher after reaching a low in mid May 2009:

Keep in mind that the put call ratio has a slight upward bias so if you draw a line you can see the connection between the July and October 2007 put call ratio lows - which coincide with the bear market top. While this measure of sentiment has increased in recent weeks, it is a long ways off reaching previous highs of 0.85+.

Below is an updated chart of the ISEE Sentiment Index (equity only) which I showed about a month ago:

Similar to the CBOE put call ratio, we’ve seen a decrease in bullishness (notice that the ISE is inverted because it is a call put ratio). Since early June 2009, the 10 day moving average has come almost straight down from 181 to 152. But as you can see, it is far from an extreme low. On November 24th, 2008 the 10 day moving average of the equity only ISE call put ratio was 108 and on March 24th, 2008 it was 104.

I’d caution you to take all options analysis with a salt lick. Both the CBOE and ISE data has not conformed to historical ‘norms’ of sentiment analysis during this bear market. For example, notice that neither recognized the March 2009 lows.

Volatility
The CBOE volatility index (VIX) continued its slow, meandering crawl downwards this week. It closed a hair’s breadth below 26, which is the lowest it has been since September 15th 2008. The VIX has fallen off many radars because during this bear market it reached unheard of levels and as a result, what was once considered extreme is now the new ‘normal’. I suspect that it will be a long time until we can put this whole episode behind us and take a look at the VIX the way we used to before.

Late last week we got the latest figures from the Reuters/University of Michigan survey. Consumer sentiment continues to recover with the preliminary June 2009 number at 69% - compared to 68.7% for May 2009. The consensus of economists was for a larger recovery but there is no doubt that US consumer sentiment is slowly recovering from the drubbing it got a few months back. Things were so extreme that we hadn’t seen such low consumer sentiment since 1980!

But there was another data point that got my attention from the Reuters/University of Michigan survey. There was an increase in the number of people expecting an increase in interest rates from 36% in May to 53% in June.

With those that expecting the opposite shrinking from 19% last month to just 10% now. This differential is the largest since August 2007 (red arrows in chart):

Keep in mind that bond yields and bond prices move inversely. So a fall in yield would be accompanied by higher bond prices.

As you can see in the chart, the red arrow doesn’t coincide exactly with the 2007 summer peak in yields but then again, if we go back we find that the chart consistently trends downwards. In fact we could look back 10, 15, 25 years and more and still find that yields in a downtrend. Of course within this macro-trend there have been some very sharp counter rallies - of which the early 2009 rally stands out.