S&P 500 Index: Now More Poor, Less Standard
3 Comments Published November 20th, 2008 in Market InternalsWhile the active vs. indexing argument rages on in the investing world, it is a moot point. Everything is actively managed. The only difference is that some funds are more actively managed than others. (Sorry Bogle.)
Every single index out there was created by someone or by some committee and it is regularly updated and managed to keep pace with the changes in the real world.
That goes for the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index, the behemoth out there that has more money following it than any other index out there. The composition of the list of 500 stocks is presided over by the S&P Index Committee, a group of employees of McGraw-Hill Companies.
They follow a few guidelines:
- U.S. Company
- Market Capitalization: min. $4 billion
- Public Float at least 50%
- Adequate Liquidity and Reasonable Price.
- Sector Representation
- Company Type: operating, not CEF, REIT or BDC
But, in the end, these are just guidelines and the committee has full discretion to include any company and to exclude another, even if it technically meets all the criteria.
Every once in a while the committee faces a rare situation where a large portion of the S&P 500 Index does not meet one or more requirement they have outlined. Usually the simply ignore it and hope that it just goes away on its own.
In October 1987 there were 35 S&P 500 Index stocks that traded for less than $10 a share. In the aftermath of the September 11th terrorist attack, 59 S&P 500 Index companies traded for less than $10 a share. Right now we are going through a similar situation.
Currently there are about 101 S&P 500 Index stocks trading at sub $10 a share. Unbelievably, one S&P 500 component, E*Trade (ETFC), closed below $1 a share. And there are 36 stocks trading below $5 a share. These are levels at which stocks are called “penny stocks”. You can find a table of the constituents, ordered by share price here:
Continue reading ‘S&P 500 Index: Now More Poor, Less Standard’
Mid Cap Index Outperforming Both Small & Large Caps
2 Comments Published June 2nd, 2008 in Market InternalsHere’s an interesting chart comparing two slices of the US stock market:

In early April, around the time the stock market recovered from the March bottom, suddenly the Mid Caps (right axis) and the Large Caps (left axis) parted ways.
This is rather strange because they walked hand in hand for a very long time. I’m not sure why exactly. Even more puzzling, the S&P 400 Mid Capitalization Index (MID) also outperformed the S&P 600 Small Cap Index (SML) - not shown on chart.
Any ideas why the Mid Caps are hitting the sweet spot now?
The market does tend to go through drawn out cycles when the large caps and the small caps take turns leading.
Here is an updated chart of this relationship showing that maybe, just maybe, the small caps are about to regain the limelight:

And here is the same chart, this time comparing the Mid Caps to the Large Caps. No question here which is leading:

As the Mid Caps and Small Caps battle it out, one thing seems clear, the big cap stocks look like they are the losers going forward. If you want to take advantage of this you can switch out of SPY into an ETF like Rydex S&P Equal Weight (RSP) (if you’re feeling like a hedge fund, short SPY and then go long RSP). Or you could just buy small cap or mid cap ETFs:
- MidCap SPDRs (MDY)
- Vanguard Mid-Cap (VO)
- iShares S&P MidCap 400 (IJH)
- iShares Russell Midcap (IWR)


Recent Comments