Trader’s Narrative

Equities, as an asset class are supposed to beat everything else in the long run. But how long is the long run supposed to be?

Is 10 years enough to be considered long run? For the past decade, equities, as measured by the S&P 500 index have been the worst asset class:

The ultimate shaming is that even a risk-free money market rate beat the dividend reinvested returns provided by US stocks. As for the other asset classes, they left equities in their dust. For me, the most surprising is the high return provided by long term government bonds. Of course, by far the best asset class was gold.

The last time we looked at this metric was in February (thanks to a chart from the New York Times). Then, the 10 year inflation adjusted return was -5.1%.

Here’s a chart of the S&P 500 index showing how we’ve see-sawed above and below the 1000 level more than a few times:

And while this is pretty horrific to anyone who was invested in equities for the past 10 years and actually expected the proverbial 10% p.a. return, it may not all be gloom and doom going forward. That’s because such negative returns over rolling 10 year periods are actually quite rare. Looking at a graph of the 10 year returns of the S&P 500 index, you notice that whenever things get this ugly, forward returns are very good. You can check out the chart in the commentary I wrote back in late November 2008: Why Long Term Investors Should Consider Buying.

That was written when the S&P 500 had an 8 handle. It dropped significantly lower so anyone with a long term time horizon would have gotten in early. But they would still be doing well right now.

By Bob Prechter

The following is an excerpt from Robert Prechter’s Elliott Wave Theorist. Elliott Wave International is currently offering Bob’s recent Elliott Wave Theorist, free.

On February 23, EWT called for the S&P to bottom in the 600s and then begin a sharp rally, the biggest since the 2007 high. The S&P bottomed at 667 on March 6. Then the stock market and commodities went almost straight up for three months as the dollar fell.

On March 18, Treasury bonds had their biggest up day ever, thanks to the Fed’s initiating its T-bond buying program. The next day, EWT reiterated our bearish stance on Treasury bonds. T-bond futures declined relentlessly from the previous day’s high at 130-15 to a low of 111-21 on June 11.

That’s when there were indications of impending trend changes. The June 11 issue called for interim tops in stocks, metals and oil and a temporary bottom in the dollar. The Dow topped that day and fell nearly 800 points; silver reversed and fell from $16 to $12.45; gold slid about $90; and oil, which had just doubled, reversed and fell from $73.38 to $58.32. The dollar simultaneously rallied and traced out a triangle for wave 4. Bonds bounced as well. As far as I can tell, our scenarios at all degrees are all on track.

Corrective patterns can be complex, so we should hesitate to be too specific about the shape this bear market rally will take. But from lows on July 8 (intraday) and 10 (close), the stock market may have begun the second phase of advance that will fulfill our ideal scenario for a three-wave (up-down-up) rally. In concert with rising stocks, bonds have started another declining wave, and the dollar appears to have turned down in wave 5 (see chart in the June issue), heading toward its final low. Although commodities should bounce, their wave patterns suggest that many key commodities will fail to make new highs this year in this second and final phase of partial recovery in the overall financial markets.

Meanwhile, our forecast for a change in people’s attitudes to a less pessimistic outlook is proceeding apace. Here are some of the reports evidencing this change:

More than 90 percent of economists predict the recession will end this year. [The] vast majority pick 3rd quarter as the time. (AP, 5/27)

Manufacturing and housing reports this week may offer signs that the recession-stricken U.S. economy is within months of hitting bottom, economists said. (USA, 6/15)

Fewer people say they’ve prospered over the past year than in decades, a USA TODAY/Gallup Poll finds. Over the past two months, however, expectations for the future have brightened significantly amid rising optimism about a stock market rebound and economic turnaround. “I think the administration is going in the right direction,” says… Now 36% of those surveyed in the Gallup-Healthways well-being poll say the economy is getting better. That’s not exactly head-over-heels exuberance, but it is double the number who felt that way at the beginning of the year and a notable spike in the nation’s frame of mind. Thirty-three percent say they’re satisfied with the way things are going in the United States; in January, just 13% did. (USA, 6/23/09)

If only to confirm the socionomic causality at work, an economist quoted in the article above muses, “The one anomaly in the puzzle is that people shouldn’t be feeling better because the jobs market is so terrible and unemployment is likely to keep rising.” Of course it would be an anomaly, and people should not feel better, if mood were exogenously caused. But it is endogenously regulated, and it precedes social actions, which produce events such as job creation and elimination. That people feel better is evident in our rising sociometer, the stock market. If the rally continues, economists will soon agree that the Fed’s “quantitative easing” and Congress’ massive spending are “working.” Those predicting more inflation and hyperinflation will have the last seeming confirmation of their opinions. Then, a few months from now, some economists will probably express similar puzzlement when the stock market starts plummeting again despite the fact that the economy has improved.

But all of these considerations are temporary. Conditions are relative, and behind the scenes, the depression has been, and still is, grinding away.

For more information, download the FREE 10-page issue of Bob Prechter’s recent Elliott Wave Theorist. It challenges current recovery hype with hard facts, independent analysis, and insightful charts. You’ll find out why the worst is NOT over and what you can do to safeguard your financial future.

Robert Prechter, Chartered Market Technician, is the founder and CEO of Elliott Wave International, author of Wall Street best-sellers Conquer the Crash and Elliott Wave Principle and editor of The Elliott Wave Theorist monthly market letter since 1979.

Guest Post By Gary Grimes

The following article is adapted from market analysis by Elliott Wave International Chief Commodity Analyst Jeffrey Kennedy. Now through July 22, Jeffrey Kennedy’s daily, intermediate, and long-term forecasts for up to 18 markets are free via EWI’s FreeWeek.

Wave patterns are like beautiful women, classic cars and great art – you know them when you see them.

EWI analyst Jeffrey Kennedy drives this point home during his live Elliott wave trading tutorial. It’s my favorite of his tips for trading with Elliott waves.

“Trade the pattern not the count,” Jeffrey says.

If you don’t recognize a pattern at a glance, don’t trade it – plain and simple. After all, your wave count can be wrong; the pattern cannot.

Does that mean you must know the exact wave count at a glance, as well? No. Simply spotting a pattern you recognize is where you should start.

Jeffrey scans hundreds of charts, clicking through them one by one, spending mere seconds with each. If he doesn’t spot a pattern he recognizes, a click of his mouse takes him to another potential opportunity.

Does price action look extended or choppy? Is it trading in a channel? Is it forming a wedge or triangle shape? These are some of the signals Jeffrey’s looking for. Each could help him identify – at the quickest of glances – whether price action is impulsive or corrective. This is the first critical step, Jeffrey says, to spotting high-confidence, Elliott wave trade setups.

That brings us to the following chart. Do you see a pattern you recognize? I do.

Look at the downward price action; the moves look decisive, almost in straight lines like impulse waves. Now look at the upward moves; they look indecisive and choppy like corrections. There’s also one down move that is clearly longer than the others – that’s almost certainly a third wave of some degree.

At just a glance, here are a few things we can determine:

• This is a bearish market pattern, because downward impulses are interrupted by upward corrections.
• The price action from September to November seems to be a pretty clear wave 3 down, followed by waves 4 up then 5 down, completing what appears to be a larger degree wave 1 in early March.
• Wave 2 follows wave 1, so the upward move starting in early March is most likely a larger degree wave 2.
• Wave 3 follows wave 2, so that’s what we can expect next.
• Wave 3 is never the shortest and often the longest of all five waves, so we can expect the next impulse move to take prices to new lows.

You see, with just a quick glance, we’ve put a finger on the pulse of the market. Negative psychology pulls prices down, and brief reversals of mood result in upward corrections – this appears to be a long-term bear market.

If you can gain this much insight simply by glancing at a chart, just think of what else you can glean by spending more time with it. Look at this pattern within a longer time frame, and you can determine the degree of trend (this one appears to be primary). Formulate Fibonacci price and time targets, and you can be confident about when and where prices will most likely turn.
There are literally hundreds of things you can do with a good chart, but none of them mean much unless you can first identify a pattern you recognize.

For more information on using patterns to spot trading opportunities, access Elliott Wave International’s FreeWeek. Now through July 22, all of EWI Chief Commodity Analyst Jeffrey Kennedy’s daily, intermediate, and long-term market forecasts are completely free.

Speaking of the long term commodity bull market, our friends at Elliott Wave International have just announced the beginning of their wildly popular FreeWeek event.

This is where they throw open the doors to some of their most popular paid services to non-subscribers for one week only. Having an independent forecasting and opportunity-spotting service on your side is more important now than ever.

FreeWeek lets you see for yourself, giving you top-level access and FREE forecasts for up to 18 different commodity markets on daily and monthly timeframes.

If you’re not taking part in EWI’s Futures Junctures FreeWeek right now, you’re already missing the valuable opportunities your peers are getting for free, and FreeWeek only lasts from noon Wednesday, July 15 to noon Wednesday, July 22. You only need to signup with a valid email. Dive into EWI’s FreeWeek Now!

If we step back from the day to day movements of the stock market and take a very wide perspective, we notice some overarching cycles at play. One of these is the 18 year stock market. Some, like Art Cashin in the video below, express it as a 17.6 year cycle but in reality this is not a precise determination. The 18 year cycle is more an average than an accurate, regularly repeating cycle:

Since stock prices are supposed to be random, it is odd to find such an orderly pattern. Why equity prices follow this rhythm may not be so befuddling if we consider commodity prices as their counter balance. For example, zooming in, we can see the period from 1980’s to the present for the Reuters/Jeffries CRB Index, the most popular proxy for the commodity markets:

While the equity markets went on a generational bull market from the 1980’s to their top in 2000, the commodities markets were in a painful and protracted bear market. This wasn’t just a coincidence. Over the long term, equities and commodities are on a teeter totter: when one is up, the other down; when one wins, the other loses. Of course this relationship isn’t evident until you step back from the short term fluctuations.

The rationale for this is simple. The price of physical goods are expenses for corporations as they are the raw materials to produce things. When the costs increase, profits decrease. This trend continues until it reaches an inflection point where it can not continue. Profits decrease and a retrenchment takes place. Demand decreases for raw materials and their prices fall.

Then this trend continues until investments in the acquirement and production of raw materials is ignored. Mines take billions of dollars to develop and can take decades to ramp up production. Oil reserves likewise are expensive to find and exploit. As the current supplies are depleted, the prices of physical goods rises. It continues to rise until it reaches a tipping point when investment in the sector once again is lucrative. And the wheel turns again.

I was introduced to this cycle when I read Hot Commodities by Jim Rogers. This is a great introductory book to the commodities markets by the way. I highly recommend it.

According to economist David Rosenberg, we are halfway through the current bear market. This estimate is in keeping with the 18 year cycle if we assume that the top was in early 2000. And the counter estimate is that we have the same period of time left in the commodities bull market. But something is amiss.

The CRB index crumbled 57% from its top in 2008. We haven’t seen such a decline before in a commodity bull market. Those are serious deflationary forces at play right now in the world economy. Which is why central banks are throwing everything and the kitchen sink at it to prevent it from spiraling out of control. Here is a free 60 page book from EWI about the dangers of deflation and how to position yourself both defensively and offensively to benefit.

Rosenberg continue to believe in a healthy commodity bull market but I’m not so sure. What we saw last year was not a normal bull market but a speculative bubble caused by lax regulations which allowed large institutions to run roughshod over everyone else and walk prices higher. The aftermath of bubbles is always ugly and unpredictable to some degree so I have my suspicions that the regular cycle was tampered with, in a sense, by this.

Art Cashin on the 17.6 Year Cycle: