It seems you have JavaScript disabled.

Ummm.. Yeah... I'm going to have to ask you to turn Javascript back on... Yeah... Thanks.

conspiracy




Weekend Reading: An Uneasy Feeling

Lazy Sunday, perfect time to catch up on what you missed and to prepare for next week. Here are just a few choice readings from the past week’s list at news.tradersnarrative.com.

  • Forward Discounting Mechanism? Why the S&P May Lag GDP
  • The Bank Crisis’ Catch-22
  • Get a 120 page report FREE from Global Market Perspective (limited time offer)
  • How Volume Distinguishes Bear Market Rallies from Bull Markets
  • Madoff’s right hand man may sing like a canary
  • Who sez there’s “no free lunch”? Get a Free Subscription to Futures Magazine
  • The Goldman Sachs Conspiracy (you’re not paranoid if they’re out to get you)
  • How Leveraged ETFs Excacerbate Volatility
  • Defined Benefits Pension Plans Haunt Wall St.
  • Have you put in your 10,000 hours yet?

Follow the link below to get much, much more:

weekend reading an uneasy feeling

And remember to check regularly since there are new links added everyday.

Week Ahead: Short Term Skittish

Technorati , , , , , , , , ,

This is for all the chart junkies out there, especially the conspiracy theorists (remember, just because you’re paranoid, doesn’t mean they’re not out to get you!).

Whenever the oil companies’ profits wane, an “energy conflict” emerges on cue to restore them to giddy heights:

oil profits and war

I’d love to see a similar chart comparing the relative stock market return of oil companies to a wide proxy like the S&P 500 Index (SPX).

The difference between the return on equity of the oil companies and of the Fortune 500 is expressed as a percent return on equity of the Fortune 500.

Note: The leading oil companies include British Petroleum (BP-Amoco since 1998), Chevron, Exxon (ExxonMobil since 1999), Mobil (until 1998), Royal-Dutch/Shell and Texaco (until 2000). Company changes are due to merger. Until 1993, the Fortune 500 included only industrial corporations (firms deriving at least half their sales revenues from manufacturing or mining). From 1994 onward, the list includes all corporations. For 1992-3, data for Fortune 500 companies are reported without SFAS 106 special charges.

Source: data from Fortune and Compustat. Chart from Bichler & Nitzan Archives.

Technorati , , , , , , , , , ,



4 free videos - market analysis

Recent Comments

  • PAUL MONTGOMERY : Glad I asked the question Babak - your link explains everything really well thanks. Was cumulative…
  • Babak : James, here’s today’s commentary on this from Rosenberg: Negative Interest Rates? That is indeed what occurred yesterday…
  • Babak : jerome, that’s an interesting take and I dare say it reveals more about your state…
  • Babak : oops, thanks for catching that Wayne…
  • wayne : The first column is the Thanksgiving week (not weekend), good luck….
  • jerome : Dollar carry trsde unwind, negative short T Bond interest rates, % from 200 day moving…
  • Dspurr624 : Supply and Demand moves prices, creates trends etc. If it were as easy as…

  feed

 Or subscribe through email:

Disclaimer

The contents of this website are presented for informational purposes only. They should not be viewed as investment advice, nor a solicitation to buy or sell any financial securities. Neither, TradersNarrative.com, its owners, and/or its representatives are registered as securities broker-dealers or investment advisors with any securities regulatory authority, in any jurisdiction.

Student Credit Card
futures trading signals
uk spread bets
Car Finance
Debt