It seems you have JavaScript disabled.

Ummm.. Yeah... I'm going to have to ask you to turn Javascript back on... Yeah... Thanks.

munis





Here is a great illustration of the point I made earlier about how NYSE breadth numbers can be misleading because they are now skewed by interest sensitive non-common stock securities (such as bonds, CEFs, munis, etc.).

Here is a chart, courtesy of SentimenTrader.com, which shows the movement of the 30 year bond yield compared to the long term moving average of the NYSE advance decline numbers:

nyse breadth and bond market.png

As you can see, they usually are mirror opposites of each other. When one is making a bottom, the other is making a top and vice versa. Of course, it isn’t a perfect correlation because the NYSE isn’t comprised of only interest rate sensitive issues. There are still many common stock securities which also have an effect on the breadth numbers. But it is obvious that what we are seeing is a blending of the two forces.

Here is a more up to date chart of the same showing the last 3 years:

nyse breadth and bond market latest 2004 to 2007.png

Technorati , , , , , , , , , ,

I’ve mentioned several times that I prefer to look at Nasdaq numbers when it comes to breadth (in a non-cumulative way) because NYSE breadth numbers are “polluted” with non-common stock securities.

These are usually interest rate sensitive. They are municipal bond funds, bonds (yes actual bonds trade on the NYSE), CEF’s, and other weird and woolly financial concoctions.

The result is that these securities move like a great galloping herd. But they don’t move to the rhythms of the stock market. Rather, they take their cue from the bond market. So when you people get spooked about rates (thinking that we won’t see a rate cut or maybe even have a rate increase) these non-common stocks get clobbered.

And that effects the NYSE breadth numbers. Let me show you with one example. Here is the chart for BlackRock Municipal Bond Trust (BBK). Last week it sliced through its 200 day moving average (blue line):

blackrock municipal bond trust bbk.png

Now look at the effect of moves like that one, multiplied by hundreds and hundreds of similar bond-like securities:

NYSE advance decline June 2007.png

That is one really oversold market? Isn’t it? We are at the same extremes that we saw at the Feb-March 2007 market bottom. But are we really? Take a look at the Nasdaq advance decline numbers:

nasdaq advance decline June 2007.png

Oversold? What oversold? We are in neutral territory. And that is how the siren call of the NYSE breadth numbers can throw you off course.

If you’re interested to know how I trade these munis, take a look at My Year End Strategy.

Technorati , , , , , , , , , , , ,



4 free videos - market analysis

Recent Comments

  • rohit kumar : Well you can checkout my blog too. It might help someone also….
  • Babak : James, here’s today’s commentary on this from Rosenberg: Negative Interest Rates? That is indeed what occurred yesterday…
  • Babak : jerome, that’s an interesting take and I dare say it reveals more about your state…
  • Babak : oops, thanks for catching that Wayne…
  • wayne : The first column is the Thanksgiving week (not weekend), good luck….
  • jerome : Dollar carry trsde unwind, negative short T Bond interest rates, % from 200 day moving…
  • Dspurr624 : Supply and Demand moves prices, creates trends etc. If it were as easy as…

  feed

 Or subscribe through email:

Disclaimer

The contents of this website are presented for informational purposes only. They should not be viewed as investment advice, nor a solicitation to buy or sell any financial securities. Neither, TradersNarrative.com, its owners, and/or its representatives are registered as securities broker-dealers or investment advisors with any securities regulatory authority, in any jurisdiction.

Student Credit Card
futures trading signals
uk spread bets
Car Finance
Debt