Trader’s Narrative

AAII
The retail investors as measured by the American Association of Individual Investor’s weekly sentiment survey are astonishingly pessimistic: 54% bearish.

To find a more gloomy view from the retail investor’s camp we’d have to go back to mid January when the AAII sentiment reached 59% bearish.

Back then I showed you this chart:

We have definitely seen 13 weeks pass since then and within a few more weeks will also complete 26 weeks. But unlike the historic average shown in the bar chart above, the market has yet to hold a decisive rally.

The S&P 500 Index (SPX) did momentarily reach a high of 1440 but couldn’t hold on to it. For most of the time we’ve been trading below the levels at which we first saw a +50% bearish AAII sentiment. As I’ve outlined before, sentiment during a bear market is a different beast.

Hulbert Newsletter Sentiment
Mark Hulbert is worried that while we may have put in a significant bottom with the March low, it may not hold. According to the Hulbert Stock Newsletter Sentiment Index (HSNSI) the average exposure recommended is a paltry 2.2%. And while this is low, back in early March the average newsletter editor was downright panicking with a -29.2% exposure - meaning actually being short the market with almost a third of total portfolio allocation.

As we head into a possible retest, it isn’t reassuring to see sentiment sitting so much above those levels. The ideal sentiment that would catapult us higher would be an even more intense panic with the kind of market weakness we’ve seen. While that may change anytime, the HSNSI doesn’t reflect that right now.

Investor’s Intelligence
No significant change in this sentiment measure: bullss dropped from 44.8% to 43% and bears increased slightly from 31.1% to 32.6%. It isn’t offering much of an edge as it sits in lukewarm waters similar to the Hulbert analysis.

CBOE Put Call Ratio
While the traditional put call ratio (equity only) did rise during the turmoil of this week, we didn’t see it reach or exceed the important 1.0 milestone. In fact, it only was able to muster a high of 0.84 on Wednesday. That reflects a good amount of fear but just not enough to carve out an important inflection point.

ISEE Sentiment
This past Wednesday and Thursday the ISEE Sentiment measure fell to 74 and 75 - the lowest since mid March low this measure reached 56 (March 10th 2008).

Remember, the ISEE sentiment numbers are calculated differently from the CBOE put call ratio. For one, the ratio is inverted with calls as the numerator and puts as the denominator. Further, the ISE only uses options which are traded by non-market makers, stripping out the noise and showing what retail and institutional traders are doing. And lastly, the ISE data is for opening orders only.

All in all, a much more robust and useful measure of options trading sentiment.

Rydex Traders
According to Jason Goepfert:

Rydex traders had finally started focusing on “safe” funds more than “risky” funds - a stark change from earlier in May when they were five times more likely to trade a risky fund than a safe one. As of yesterday, the ratio fell under 0.5, meaning that those folks were more than twice as likely to trade a safe fund than a risky one.

Conclusion
Since I eschew using a single indicator to light the way, the weight of the indicators are confusing with many cross currents pulling me in different directions. The troubling and somewhat muddy sentiment outlook doesn’t help. Hopefully things will resolve themselves soon and the picture will become clearer.

Here’s this week’s sentiment summary:

NASDAQ:NYSE Volume
I touched on the relative lack of volume and how this has historically marked tops, rather than spurred on rallies. Another troubling volume development is the ratio of volume on the Nasdaq compared to the NYSE. We are seeing a spike in this ratio, meaning that Nasdaq volume is significantly more than NYSE volume. Since the Nasdaq represents the riskier side of the market, this has usually meant that there is too much froth in the market.

Sentiment Surveys
Last week I pointed out the danger of having the AAII remain at 53% bullish when the market had gone down slightly. Although this week the AAII respondents were slightly less bullish (45%) it is good to see their excitement abate in the face of a week that saw the market go up.

This reversal however only slightly dilutes the contrarian bearish meaning of this indicator. We are still at a very high level of bullishness. Simply by receding from the extreme level of bullishness that we saw last week does not eliminate the topping signal that the AAII is giving us at this point. After all, it was in October 2007 when we last saw this sentiment measure at such heights.

Investor’s Intelligence, the measure of newsletter sentiment compiled by ChartCraft, showed little change going from 44.4% bullish to 46% bullish.

Hulbert Newsletter Sentiment Survey
In contrast to the sentiment surveys mentioned above, the Hulbert Stock Newsletter Sentiment Index is continuing to suggest that newsletter editor are still either skeptical of the market’s recovery or not really excited by it.

At the start of the week, the HSNSI was 16.2%, meaning that the average market timing newsletter was suggesting to their clients being long just 16.2% of their portfolio. This is much lower than the 27.5% which they were recommending in late April, even though at that time the market was lower than it is now.

Slicing and dicing the newsletters, Hulber finds that the stock market newsletters with the best track record of timing the market are continuing to be bullish, while those that have lagged buy and hold are much less so. This gap in sentiment and performance has, however, significantly diminished from mid-March - when the market hit its inflection point.

Is LowRisk Dead?
A reader already asked about the lack of updates from LowRisk. I emailed Jeff Walker, the keeper of the data and when or if I receive a reply I’ll write a follow up. The last update on their site is for March 23rd 2008. I haven’t received any email updates either - I’m subscribed. In any case, LowRisk was never one of the major sentiment surveys that I relied on. It was a bit too volatile and no one except Walker knew the size of the sample size.

Magazine Cover Indicator
Here’s an interesting magazine cover for analysis (below): “Barbarians at the vault”. It is the latest Economist cover showing a bank being besieged by a horde of angry “barbarians” carrying banners with such slogans as :

• Skin the fat cats!
• Just say no to CDOs
• Regulate now
• Salary limits

The building is on fire, there is a column being pulled and there are sledgehammers being taken to its pillars. Pretty powerful imagery. I wonder how it will play out with the Philadelphia Banking Index being where it is:

Check out the Economist’s “prowling bear” cover in 2006. As disclosure, I’m long the AMEX Financial Select Sector ETF (XLF).