It seems you have JavaScript disabled.

Ummm.. Yeah... I'm going to have to ask you to turn Javascript back on... Yeah... Thanks.

progressive taxation




John McCain vs. John McCain

Somehow, for some strange reason a progressive tax system which is what the US has had and which it will continue to have, has been called a “socialist” system by the McCain campaign:

“His (Obama’s) plans are redistribution of wealth.. that is one of the tenets of socialism.”

But as anyone will readily attest, a progressive tax system does exactly that, it “spreads the wealth around”. The only question which the government and candidates haggle over is not if wealth will be spread around, but how much.

By now Obama and McCain’s tax plans have both been picked cleaner than a carcass by a pack of economists from both sides of the spectrum. There is unanimous consensus that Obama’s tax plans will give more money to lower income earners and tax the wealthy a little more. Take a look at this excellent visualization for more details (courtesy of ChartJunk)

So is taxing the wealthy a tad more a bad thing?

John McCain doesn’t think so. Or at least, didn’t used to think so.

Listen as he answer’s a young woman’s question in this following video. She even brings up the “S” word (socialism) and McCain rightfully bats it down graciously.

“When you reach a certain level of comfort, there is nothing wrong with paying somewhat more”

“I think the first people that deserve a tax cut are working Americans with children…”

Where did this McCain go? This version would have stood a chance of actually winning against Obama. This version wouldn’t have given more tax cuts to millionaires while ignoring “working Americans” as his current tax plan does.

Look, I consider myself a capitalist through and through. Having said that, it doesn’t take a genius to see the inherent problem that concentration of wealth presents to any society. We are not a collection of individuals, we are a community, a society and we need to understand that. What is best for 0.1% of the wealthiest shouldn’t be ahead of what is best for the 99% of the rest of society.

For this and (many) other reasons, I’m saddened that as a non-US citizen I can not take part in this US election and vote for Barack Obama.

Technorati , , , , , , , ,



4 free videos - market analysis

Recent Comments

  • PAUL MONTGOMERY : Glad I asked the question Babak - your link explains everything really well thanks. Was cumulative…
  • Babak : James, here’s today’s commentary on this from Rosenberg: Negative Interest Rates? That is indeed what occurred yesterday…
  • Babak : jerome, that’s an interesting take and I dare say it reveals more about your state…
  • Babak : oops, thanks for catching that Wayne…
  • wayne : The first column is the Thanksgiving week (not weekend), good luck….
  • jerome : Dollar carry trsde unwind, negative short T Bond interest rates, % from 200 day moving…
  • Dspurr624 : Supply and Demand moves prices, creates trends etc. If it were as easy as…

  feed

 Or subscribe through email:

Disclaimer

The contents of this website are presented for informational purposes only. They should not be viewed as investment advice, nor a solicitation to buy or sell any financial securities. Neither, TradersNarrative.com, its owners, and/or its representatives are registered as securities broker-dealers or investment advisors with any securities regulatory authority, in any jurisdiction.

Student Credit Card
futures trading signals
uk spread bets
Car Finance
Debt