Trader’s Narrative

The following article is adapted from a brand-new 50-page ebook from Elliott Wave International. Learn more about The Ultimate Technical Analysis Handbook, and download your free copy here.

By Jeffrey Kennedy

When I began my career as an analyst, I was lucky enough to have some time with a few old pros.

One in particular that I will always remember told me that a kid with a ruler could make a million dollars in the markets. He was talking about trendlines. I was sold.

I spent nearly three years drawing trendlines and all sorts of geometric shapes on price charts. And you know, that grizzled old trader was only half right.

Trendlines are one the most simple and dynamic tools an analyst can employ… but I have yet to make my million dollars, so he was wrong — or at least early — on that point.

Despite being extremely useful, trendlines are often overlooked. I guess it’s just human nature to discard the simple in favor of the complicated.

(Heaven knows, if they don’t understand it, it must work, right?)

In the chart above, I have drawn a trendline using two lows that occurred in early August and September of 2003.

As you can see, each time prices approached this line, they reversed course and advanced.

Sometimes, soybeans only fell to near this line before turning up.

Other times, prices broke through momentarily before resuming the larger uptrend.

What still amazes me is that two seemingly insignificant lows in 2002 pointed the direction of soybeans — and identified several potential buying opportunities — for the next six months!

Get more lessons like the one above in the free 50-page Ultimate Technical Analysis Handbook. Learn more and download your free copy here.

Jeffrey Kennedy is the Chief Commodity Analyst at Elliott Wave International (EWI). With more than 15 years of experience as a technical analyst, he writes and edits Futures Junctures, EWI’s premier commodity forecasting service.

On October 9th, as the market dropped into the abyss and then stepped back to form a wide ranging doji candlestick, I quipped that if this wasn’t a bottom, to go find a cave and buy a gun.

After a brief sojourn below the low of that day, the market recovered and is now trying to claw its way back for good. Many are noticing that the S&P 500 has now broken above its downtrend line (two):

But as you can see in the chart, this isn’t really the first time it has done that during this downturn. In late October, it decisively broke above the downtrend line (one) with a very wide range up day.

Then it gave it all back and more, falling well below its previous swing low. My hunch is that the third time will be the charm (light green three).

If we invert the chart and imagine it has been uptrending, it is easy to notice the familiar pattern of 3 line breaks.

Far be it from me to criticize a luminary of technical analysis but it certainly appears that Richard Russell is confused.

For those who are unfamiliar with him, Richard Russell is known as the Sage of the Dow for his expertise in Dow Theory. He has been writing about the market non-stop for more than 50 years and has made some truly legendary calls.

In the past few years Russell was very bearish and recommended gold instead of equities. This changed in May 2007 when he surprised everyone by turning into a bull, saying, “an unprecedented world boom lies ahead”.

But recently Russell has changed his mind again, saying, “the long-term trendline has been violated… Until proven otherwise, the long-term trend of the Dow is now down.”

He was referring to the red support line in the chart below:

Russell drew the trend line from the low in 1982, the launchpad of the great bull market in modern history, to the low of the bear market in October 2002. Clearly, this support is now violated to the downside.

This sounds very logical but if you stay with me for a bit, I’ll explain why I have a tough time accepting it.

Let’s imagine that we have gone back in time to the desolate bear market of 2002. Prices are careening into an abyss, pessimism is so thick you can cut it with a broker’s statement.

Now, standing as we are back in 2002, we follow the same process that Russell did and draw a trend line showing the support level in the Dow Jones from the bottom of 1982, connecting it to the low in 1995 and the low created in the aftermath of the September 11th 2001 tragedy. The line would look something like the dashed purple one in the chart above.

Obviously, even if we imagine ourselves in October 2002, for the sake of this exercise, we had no way to know for sure that this was the bottom. So rather than use it as the point through which to draw the trend line, we would use the points mentioned above.

So the conclusion that we would then draw is that the long term chart of the market is broken and the trend of the Dow is down.

But that would be incorrect.

Because not only would the worst of the bear market already have been over, within a very short time a new bull market would be born.

So clearly, hunkering down into “bear market mode” at this point in time (mid to late 2002) would do us no good at all. In fact, the smartest thing would be the opposite, to have cast around for beaten down stocks to buy in anticipation of the termination of the brutal bear market that we had so far endured.

Richard Russell usually concentrates on the Dow Jones but here is the chart of the S&P 500 for good measure, showing the same thing:

In the end, I’m afraid this leaves us where we started: confused. But it is one thing to flop around randomly, switching sides as the wind blows, and quite another to confess in frank humility before the power of the market that one is confused.

So everyone is running around in a panic, dumping bonds and equities for fear that the Fed will increase rates to fight inflation. The 10 year bond yield, which everyone is watching like a hawk all of a sudden, has been blasting higher in anticipation.

Only thing is, I can’t seem to find any footprints of this inflation monster everyone is afraid of. But the markets are a forward discounting mechanism. Maybe they are sensing that inflation, although not here right now, is just around the corner.

True, markets do look forward and incorporate all sorts of scenarios but wouldn’t that same forward discounting mechanism be at work in markets like gold, silver, and the CRB (Commodity Research Bureau Index)?

Each of these markets is also a tell for upcoming inflation. And each of those tells is not confirming inflation fears. Gold, which I’ve already covered, is actually in what looks to be a topping pattern after a multi-year bull market.

The same can be said for silver (and perhaps with much more conviction). And last year, the CRB index broke its long term uptrend line. This trendline had been in effect since the double bottom of the CRB (in early 1999 and late 2001 at the 185 area) so it was very significant.

Getting back to the bond market, for the past 20 years, the 10 year bond yield has been in very orderly down trending channel. Everytime it has hit the top of this channel, bonds have rallied. This has happened about half a dozen times. Once again we are at the top of the channel.

Is it different this time?

Speaking of turtle trading (Way of the Turtle book review) and trend following, anyone noticed that the Mexican stock exchange has been on fire for the past few years? The chart looks beautiful with a gradual angle of ascent and very orderly pullbacks to support (200 day moving average):

If you look at a very long term chart (20+ years) you will see that this trend built a solid base from which to take off. The Mexican markets reached a peak in early 1994 and didn’t revisit that level until 2004! After basing just under the resistance level (~11,000) for a few months, they broke out in late 2004. And never looked back.

Until last year, Brazil (EWZ) was the strongest Latin market. Then it faltered and was overtaken by Mexico. Also notice how the relative strength of the Mexican market was extremely strong against the S&P 500. Even after each pullback the trendline of the relative strength was not broken. They were merely dips within a march upward.

So, is it too late to jump in? Well, considering that the base was 10 years in the making, a measured move would also last approximately 10 years. We’re in the 3rd year, so we have quite a ways to go yet. That being said, I wouldn’t just jump in headfirst. Wait for a pullback, especially to support levels or to a long term moving average (or sweeter still, the conjunction of both).

And if you’re a short term trader, put it up on your watchlist. It is almost in ‘free air’ territory again (meaning that every long is happy). We could have a breakout and long range day today if it breaks out of the mid-February resistance level.

Another way to play this is to not use the ETF (EWW) but to drill down to the components and find the strongest individual stocks and play those on the long side. The advantage is that you’ll get more beta for your bucks, but you’ll probably be stepping in much less liquid securities.