<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Looking at the TSX Composite</title>
	<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/looking-at-the-tsx-composite-180.html</link>
	<description>Freshly squeezed market commentary &#038; analysis</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Ugly, But Good at Trader&#8217;s Narrative</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/looking-at-the-tsx-composite-180.html#comment-43</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 06:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/looking-at-the-tsx-composite-180.html#comment-43</guid>
					<description>[...] And today, the ratio of TSX % above 50MA and 200MA - which I mentioned just yesterday - reached 0.39. At this level it is seriously oversold and is just begging for a snap back rally. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] And today, the ratio of TSX % above 50MA and 200MA - which I mentioned just yesterday - reached 0.39. At this level it is seriously oversold and is just begging for a snap back rally. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Babak</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/looking-at-the-tsx-composite-180.html#comment-34</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 16:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/looking-at-the-tsx-composite-180.html#comment-34</guid>
					<description>Perhaps my explanation wasn't clear enough. Of course you can not have more than 100% or less than 0% of stocks above any MA. The right scale of the graph is showing a ratio: the % of stocks above 50 MA divided by the % of stocks above 200 MA (in the TSX Composite). As I point out, that is my &lt;a href=&quot;http://tradersnarrative.com/timing-the-market-with-above-ma-ratios-32.html&quot;&gt;unique take on this metric&lt;/a&gt;. Hope that is clear now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps my explanation wasn&#8217;t clear enough. Of course you can not have more than 100% or less than 0% of stocks above any MA. The right scale of the graph is showing a ratio: the % of stocks above 50 MA divided by the % of stocks above 200 MA (in the TSX Composite). As I point out, that is my <a href="http://tradersnarrative.com/timing-the-market-with-above-ma-ratios-32.html">unique take on this metric</a>. Hope that is clear now.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: C. Maoxian</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/looking-at-the-tsx-composite-180.html#comment-32</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 06:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/looking-at-the-tsx-composite-180.html#comment-32</guid>
					<description>I don't get the right scale... can there be more than 100% of stocks above both their 50 and 200 day MAs?  Should 1.00 be the max?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get the right scale&#8230; can there be more than 100% of stocks above both their 50 and 200 day MAs?  Should 1.00 be the max?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
