<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Market Recovers By The Skin Of Its Teeth</title>
	<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/market-recovers-by-the-skin-of-its-teeth-1031.html</link>
	<description>Freshly squeezed market commentary &#038; analysis</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Economist &#38; Barrons Magazine Covers - Sentiment Overview: Week Of January 25th, 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/market-recovers-by-the-skin-of-its-teeth-1031.html#comment-28069</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 06:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/market-recovers-by-the-skin-of-its-teeth-1031.html#comment-28069</guid>
					<description>[...] This dichotomy of sentiment between the newsletter writers and retail investors is rare but it has occurred before. Usually we can discount it because of the subjective method that II uses to come up with the results. But we have confirmation from the Hulbert newsletter sentiment indicators. So for whatever reason, newsletters have not thrown in the towel, despite the +20% market decline. This could be a fly in the ointment, unless we see them capitulate soon. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] This dichotomy of sentiment between the newsletter writers and retail investors is rare but it has occurred before. Usually we can discount it because of the subjective method that II uses to come up with the results. But we have confirmation from the Hulbert newsletter sentiment indicators. So for whatever reason, newsletters have not thrown in the towel, despite the +20% market decline. This could be a fly in the ointment, unless we see them capitulate soon. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
