<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nasdaq Bullish Percent Index Back To 2007 Level</title>
	<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/nasdaq-bullish-percent-index-back-to-2007-level-2492.html</link>
	<description>Freshly squeezed market commentary &#038; analysis</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Russ Abbott</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/nasdaq-bullish-percent-index-back-to-2007-level-2492.html#comment-38572</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/nasdaq-bullish-percent-index-back-to-2007-level-2492.html#comment-38572</guid>
					<description>Sorry for all these comments. I'm trying to get the system to change its record of my web address.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for all these comments. I&#8217;m trying to get the system to change its record of my web address.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Russ Abbott</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/nasdaq-bullish-percent-index-back-to-2007-level-2492.html#comment-38571</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/nasdaq-bullish-percent-index-back-to-2007-level-2492.html#comment-38571</guid>
					<description>P.S. My new web address is  http://optionexperiments.wordpress.com, where I track my option trading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S. My new web address is  <a href='http://optionexperiments.wordpress.com' rel='nofollow'>http://optionexperiments.wordpress.com</a>, where I track my option trading.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Russ Abbott</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/nasdaq-bullish-percent-index-back-to-2007-level-2492.html#comment-38570</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/nasdaq-bullish-percent-index-back-to-2007-level-2492.html#comment-38570</guid>
					<description>A concern with figures like the first one above: the BPI was above 50% for about 9 months at the end of '06 and the start of '07. Yet no &quot;signal&quot; is indicated. Why not? 

In addition, one can't draw an arrow to a &quot;peak&quot; until some time after an index retreats from that peak. For example, there is a red arrow at the BPI peak in Oct '08. But at the time that peak occurred, the value was significantly below the BPI values just a few months prior. How did one know AT THAT TIME, that a reading of slightly over 50% would be a peak?  One didn't know until perhaps a month later when one could look back and see that it was a peak. 

Similarly, how do we know now that the current reading is a peak. It may go higher in the the coming days/weeks. It may go lower. Only in hindsight does one know when a peak has occurred. 

I see this as a problem with most indicators that are read as giving signals at peaks. One simply doesn't know that a peak has occurred until significantly after the fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A concern with figures like the first one above: the BPI was above 50% for about 9 months at the end of &#8216;06 and the start of &#8216;07. Yet no &#8220;signal&#8221; is indicated. Why not? </p>
<p>In addition, one can&#8217;t draw an arrow to a &#8220;peak&#8221; until some time after an index retreats from that peak. For example, there is a red arrow at the BPI peak in Oct &#8216;08. But at the time that peak occurred, the value was significantly below the BPI values just a few months prior. How did one know AT THAT TIME, that a reading of slightly over 50% would be a peak?  One didn&#8217;t know until perhaps a month later when one could look back and see that it was a peak. </p>
<p>Similarly, how do we know now that the current reading is a peak. It may go higher in the the coming days/weeks. It may go lower. Only in hindsight does one know when a peak has occurred. </p>
<p>I see this as a problem with most indicators that are read as giving signals at peaks. One simply doesn&#8217;t know that a peak has occurred until significantly after the fact.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: George</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/nasdaq-bullish-percent-index-back-to-2007-level-2492.html#comment-38568</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/nasdaq-bullish-percent-index-back-to-2007-level-2492.html#comment-38568</guid>
					<description>What we have to ask ourselves is the reliability of this indicator in a severe bear market. While it did a good job of pinpointing a major inflection point in October of 07', it would be interesting to check the behavior of this indicator in the 2000-2003 bear. How did it behave as that bear market began to shift into a bull. Babak, good stuff as always, George</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What we have to ask ourselves is the reliability of this indicator in a severe bear market. While it did a good job of pinpointing a major inflection point in October of 07&#8242;, it would be interesting to check the behavior of this indicator in the 2000-2003 bear. How did it behave as that bear market began to shift into a bull. Babak, good stuff as always, George
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
