<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Highs For The Year But Market Breadth Stinks</title>
	<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/new-highs-for-the-year-but-market-breadth-stinks-3239.html</link>
	<description>Freshly squeezed market commentary &#038; analysis</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Babak</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/new-highs-for-the-year-but-market-breadth-stinks-3239.html#comment-57565</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/new-highs-for-the-year-but-market-breadth-stinks-3239.html#comment-57565</guid>
					<description>Paul, yes cumulative has got some problems as you saw in the detailed post from the link above. That's why I average the daily readings instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, yes cumulative has got some problems as you saw in the detailed post from the link above. That&#8217;s why I average the daily readings instead.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: PAUL MONTGOMERY</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/new-highs-for-the-year-but-market-breadth-stinks-3239.html#comment-57516</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/new-highs-for-the-year-but-market-breadth-stinks-3239.html#comment-57516</guid>
					<description>Glad I asked the question Babak - your link explains everything really well thanks.

Was cumulative btw</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad I asked the question Babak - your link explains everything really well thanks.</p>
<p>Was cumulative btw
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Babak</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/new-highs-for-the-year-but-market-breadth-stinks-3239.html#comment-57415</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/new-highs-for-the-year-but-market-breadth-stinks-3239.html#comment-57415</guid>
					<description>Paul, I don't use &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tradersnarrative.com/nyse-breadth-is-strong-why-it-doesnt-matter-2506.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;cumulative breadth on either the NYSE or Nasdaq&lt;/a&gt;. Are you referring to the cumulative or the daily average, as I've shown above?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, I don&#8217;t use <a href="http://www.tradersnarrative.com/nyse-breadth-is-strong-why-it-doesnt-matter-2506.html" rel="nofollow">cumulative breadth on either the NYSE or Nasdaq</a>. Are you referring to the cumulative or the daily average, as I&#8217;ve shown above?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: PAUL MONTGOMERY</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/new-highs-for-the-year-but-market-breadth-stinks-3239.html#comment-57372</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/new-highs-for-the-year-but-market-breadth-stinks-3239.html#comment-57372</guid>
					<description>Babak - like u, I prefer looking at Nasdaq breadth rather than NYSE, as it is cleaner.

However I can't help being impressed by the NYSE A/D Line being at the August 07 Highs again.
And the NYSE A/D Line correctly &quot;called&quot; the Oct 07 top by diverging / peaking a few months before then in August.
Wheras Nasdaq A/D Line peaked a few years before that I beleive.

Would apreciate your thoughts on this, as I really value your opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Babak - like u, I prefer looking at Nasdaq breadth rather than NYSE, as it is cleaner.</p>
<p>However I can&#8217;t help being impressed by the NYSE A/D Line being at the August 07 Highs again.<br />
And the NYSE A/D Line correctly &#8220;called&#8221; the Oct 07 top by diverging / peaking a few months before then in August.<br />
Wheras Nasdaq A/D Line peaked a few years before that I beleive.</p>
<p>Would apreciate your thoughts on this, as I really value your opinion.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Babak</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/new-highs-for-the-year-but-market-breadth-stinks-3239.html#comment-57356</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/new-highs-for-the-year-but-market-breadth-stinks-3239.html#comment-57356</guid>
					<description>felix, while everyone can't help but 'talk their book' - why else would they hold a position if they didn't believe in it? - I'm not short. Just not long (anymore).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>felix, while everyone can&#8217;t help but &#8216;talk their book&#8217; - why else would they hold a position if they didn&#8217;t believe in it? - I&#8217;m not short. Just not long (anymore).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: felix bartram</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/new-highs-for-the-year-but-market-breadth-stinks-3239.html#comment-57321</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/new-highs-for-the-year-but-market-breadth-stinks-3239.html#comment-57321</guid>
					<description>thank you for the information, but i sense that you are short, and getting blasted on the way up.
respectful, i disagree with your call regarding the advances vs declines, as evident today's rally;even the financials were participants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you for the information, but i sense that you are short, and getting blasted on the way up.<br />
respectful, i disagree with your call regarding the advances vs declines, as evident today&#8217;s rally;even the financials were participants.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
