<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oil &#038; Gas Exploration SPDR (XOP): Shooting Star</title>
	<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/oil-gas-exploration-spdr-xop-shooting-star-1730.html</link>
	<description>Freshly squeezed market commentary &#038; analysis</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/oil-gas-exploration-spdr-xop-shooting-star-1730.html#comment-33401</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 07:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/oil-gas-exploration-spdr-xop-shooting-star-1730.html#comment-33401</guid>
					<description>Thank you for that view.... 

A good reversal in the oil stocks (and miners generally) one would think bodes well for the rest of the market. There certainly appears to be &quot;paralysis&quot; elsewhere in the market due in particular to oil... Hopefully &quot;fundamentals&quot; will be restored, sooner rather than later in matters oily!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for that view&#8230;. </p>
<p>A good reversal in the oil stocks (and miners generally) one would think bodes well for the rest of the market. There certainly appears to be &#8220;paralysis&#8221; elsewhere in the market due in particular to oil&#8230; Hopefully &#8220;fundamentals&#8221; will be restored, sooner rather than later in matters oily!!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Babak</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/oil-gas-exploration-spdr-xop-shooting-star-1730.html#comment-33394</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 23:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/oil-gas-exploration-spdr-xop-shooting-star-1730.html#comment-33394</guid>
					<description>Bruce, the first trendline would be a logical place, which would mean around $50. But I wouldn't be surprised to see it break hard since such a ramp up is indicative of a lot of speculative froth and &quot;fast money&quot;.

Al, you may be right but the same trendline (1) is in effect if we start out in August 2007 instead of October 2006.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruce, the first trendline would be a logical place, which would mean around $50. But I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised to see it break hard since such a ramp up is indicative of a lot of speculative froth and &#8220;fast money&#8221;.</p>
<p>Al, you may be right but the same trendline (1) is in effect if we start out in August 2007 instead of October 2006.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Al</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/oil-gas-exploration-spdr-xop-shooting-star-1730.html#comment-33389</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 17:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/oil-gas-exploration-spdr-xop-shooting-star-1730.html#comment-33389</guid>
					<description>What indicates that a trend has changed slope? It seems that the trendline is averaged over a period of time which becomes ever shorter as you move from period 1 to 2 and 3. For the TLs plotted over  shorter periods of time you will find greater sensitivity to price changes and hence higher likelihood of a trend changing slope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What indicates that a trend has changed slope? It seems that the trendline is averaged over a period of time which becomes ever shorter as you move from period 1 to 2 and 3. For the TLs plotted over  shorter periods of time you will find greater sensitivity to price changes and hence higher likelihood of a trend changing slope.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/oil-gas-exploration-spdr-xop-shooting-star-1730.html#comment-33361</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 01:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/oil-gas-exploration-spdr-xop-shooting-star-1730.html#comment-33361</guid>
					<description>Babak; If this were to reverse, to what level would seem &quot;likely&quot; given its current trend? 55 &quot;ish&quot;, and thereby a break of trend, or mini pull-back to 62.5 then to resume?

Is the third increase angle of ascent you speak of usually shorter (in time) than the two proceeding...as a general rule?

Cheers

from Australia

(enjoy your articles by the way)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Babak; If this were to reverse, to what level would seem &#8220;likely&#8221; given its current trend? 55 &#8220;ish&#8221;, and thereby a break of trend, or mini pull-back to 62.5 then to resume?</p>
<p>Is the third increase angle of ascent you speak of usually shorter (in time) than the two proceeding&#8230;as a general rule?</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>from Australia</p>
<p>(enjoy your articles by the way)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Babak</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/oil-gas-exploration-spdr-xop-shooting-star-1730.html#comment-33340</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 02:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/oil-gas-exploration-spdr-xop-shooting-star-1730.html#comment-33340</guid>
					<description>brandon, I'm not sure what you mean but those lines are support lines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>brandon, I&#8217;m not sure what you mean but those lines are support lines.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/oil-gas-exploration-spdr-xop-shooting-star-1730.html#comment-33330</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 01:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/oil-gas-exploration-spdr-xop-shooting-star-1730.html#comment-33330</guid>
					<description>The technical for this chart is interesting.  The question that I would like to know is that are the 3 counts of XOP counting from the supporting or resistant point?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The technical for this chart is interesting.  The question that I would like to know is that are the 3 counts of XOP counting from the supporting or resistant point?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
