Comments on: Record Number Of 52 Week Lows http://www.tradersnarrative.com/record-number-of-52-week-lows-75.html Freshly squeezed market commentary & analysis Sun, 12 Oct 2008 08:40:51 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2 by: Ratio Of New 52 Week Highs & Lows Confirms Extreme http://www.tradersnarrative.com/record-number-of-52-week-lows-75.html#comment-28656 Fri, 01 Feb 2008 06:18:19 +0000 http://www.tradersnarrative.com/record-number-of-52-week-lows-75.html#comment-28656 [...] A few days ago I featured the charts of the new 52 week lows for the Nasdaq and the NYSE showing that we’d have to go back all the way to 1998 to find higher extremes. [...] […] A few days ago I featured the charts of the new 52 week lows for the Nasdaq and the NYSE showing that we’d have to go back all the way to 1998 to find higher extremes. […]

]]> by: Babak http://www.tradersnarrative.com/record-number-of-52-week-lows-75.html#comment-28592 Thu, 31 Jan 2008 18:55:36 +0000 http://www.tradersnarrative.com/record-number-of-52-week-lows-75.html#comment-28592 Johan, you're correct, we do have more issues but that becomes problematic over the long term. The graph I showed only covers 10 years. In any case, I'm going to share another graph which will iron out this problem. Johan, you’re correct, we do have more issues but that becomes problematic over the long term. The graph I showed only covers 10 years.

In any case, I’m going to share another graph which will iron out this problem.

]]> by: Johan http://www.tradersnarrative.com/record-number-of-52-week-lows-75.html#comment-28423 Wed, 30 Jan 2008 18:20:19 +0000 http://www.tradersnarrative.com/record-number-of-52-week-lows-75.html#comment-28423 Don't we have a LOT more issues trading now than 10 years ago?? I think it is strange to measure with absolute numbers instead of relatives. I can't figure out one situation where absolute numbers give more info than the relative ones. I know that we don't always find that data so easily but wanted to point it out anyway. Don’t we have a LOT more issues trading now than 10 years ago??

I think it is strange to measure with absolute numbers instead of relatives. I can’t figure out one situation where absolute numbers give more info than the relative ones.

I know that we don’t always find that data so easily but wanted to point it out anyway.

]]> by: wes http://www.tradersnarrative.com/record-number-of-52-week-lows-75.html#comment-28261 Tue, 29 Jan 2008 21:43:49 +0000 http://www.tradersnarrative.com/record-number-of-52-week-lows-75.html#comment-28261 While it's entirely possible that the low on this move has already been recorded, I'd like to point out that after wipe out moves similar to this one, in the past lengthy and significant moves up have usually followed. Missing the first few points of such an up move won't matter much. I'm looking for a more reliable "W" formation in the major averages. While it’s entirely possible that the low on this move has already been recorded, I’d like to point out that after wipe out moves similar to this one, in the past lengthy and significant moves up have usually followed. Missing the first few points of such an up move won’t matter much.

I’m looking for a more reliable “W” formation in the major averages.

]]> by: Doug http://www.tradersnarrative.com/record-number-of-52-week-lows-75.html#comment-28172 Tue, 29 Jan 2008 15:00:41 +0000 http://www.tradersnarrative.com/record-number-of-52-week-lows-75.html#comment-28172 Based on most of the sentiment indicators, it certainly looks like great buying opps are here. I'd like to open some discussion on what the opposing viewpoints are... Could this become a self-fulfiling prophecy? Will the bond market turmoil top the initial mortgage issues? I'd like the 'devil's' advocate position here as well to be balanced. Based on most of the sentiment indicators, it certainly looks like great buying opps are here. I’d like to open some discussion on what the opposing viewpoints are… Could this become a self-fulfiling prophecy? Will the bond market turmoil top the initial mortgage issues? I’d like the ‘devil’s’ advocate position here as well to be balanced.

]]>