<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review of Previous Canadian REITs Analysis</title>
	<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/review-of-previous-canadian-reits-analysis-1649.html</link>
	<description>Freshly squeezed market commentary &#038; analysis</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 03:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Babak</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/review-of-previous-canadian-reits-analysis-1649.html#comment-34727</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 22:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/review-of-previous-canadian-reits-analysis-1649.html#comment-34727</guid>
					<description>PhilC, slightly less than half actually - but the price hasn't budged!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PhilC, slightly less than half actually - but the price hasn&#8217;t budged!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: PhilC</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/review-of-previous-canadian-reits-analysis-1649.html#comment-34726</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 20:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/review-of-previous-canadian-reits-analysis-1649.html#comment-34726</guid>
					<description>Distribution was just cut in half. It's 8% now. Still pretty good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Distribution was just cut in half. It&#8217;s 8% now. Still pretty good.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Whasit</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/review-of-previous-canadian-reits-analysis-1649.html#comment-33963</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 08:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/review-of-previous-canadian-reits-analysis-1649.html#comment-33963</guid>
					<description>CRH.UN is a steal. It pays out 15% over the course of a year in distributions but the unit price drops by 50%!

Some math there my friend!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CRH.UN is a steal. It pays out 15% over the course of a year in distributions but the unit price drops by 50%!</p>
<p>Some math there my friend!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Babak</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/review-of-previous-canadian-reits-analysis-1649.html#comment-32871</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/review-of-previous-canadian-reits-analysis-1649.html#comment-32871</guid>
					<description>Iris, you mean Charter REIT? it is in the post: CRH.un

Truth, what are you talking about comrade? glorious market for benefit of all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iris, you mean Charter REIT? it is in the post: CRH.un</p>
<p>Truth, what are you talking about comrade? glorious market for benefit of all!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Truth</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/review-of-previous-canadian-reits-analysis-1649.html#comment-32869</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/review-of-previous-canadian-reits-analysis-1649.html#comment-32869</guid>
					<description>Central planning doesn't work.  You should know that!  Market is setting up a top in here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Central planning doesn&#8217;t work.  You should know that!  Market is setting up a top in here.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Iris Shaw</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/review-of-previous-canadian-reits-analysis-1649.html#comment-32867</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 09:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/review-of-previous-canadian-reits-analysis-1649.html#comment-32867</guid>
					<description>What is the symbol of the Canadian Reit?

Iris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the symbol of the Canadian Reit?</p>
<p>Iris
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Babak</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/review-of-previous-canadian-reits-analysis-1649.html#comment-32851</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 01:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/review-of-previous-canadian-reits-analysis-1649.html#comment-32851</guid>
					<description>Phil,
well, the share price has definitely reverted to the mean. That is it now at a long term support and that the yield is so juicy and that it is a small REIT with potential for growth, all of these made me take a punt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil,<br />
well, the share price has definitely reverted to the mean. That is it now at a long term support and that the yield is so juicy and that it is a small REIT with potential for growth, all of these made me take a punt.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: PhilC</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/review-of-previous-canadian-reits-analysis-1649.html#comment-32825</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/review-of-previous-canadian-reits-analysis-1649.html#comment-32825</guid>
					<description>You are right 100% is a good thing. I'm just worried about reversion to the mean.
So... What made you click for CRH?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right 100% is a good thing. I&#8217;m just worried about reversion to the mean.<br />
So&#8230; What made you click for CRH?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Babak</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/review-of-previous-canadian-reits-analysis-1649.html#comment-32821</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 18:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/review-of-previous-canadian-reits-analysis-1649.html#comment-32821</guid>
					<description>Phil, this is the first time I've seen a high occupancy rate held against a REIT! I'm not sure I follow your logic. Granted, they are tiny, but if they can fill all their potential space in such a challenging market, what is wrong with that exactly?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil, this is the first time I&#8217;ve seen a high occupancy rate held against a REIT! I&#8217;m not sure I follow your logic. Granted, they are tiny, but if they can fill all their potential space in such a challenging market, what is wrong with that exactly?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: PhilC</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/review-of-previous-canadian-reits-analysis-1649.html#comment-32820</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/review-of-previous-canadian-reits-analysis-1649.html#comment-32820</guid>
					<description>What made you click for CRH? The 15% payout is interesting, but most of their malls are 100% rented. A slowdown would certainly cripple their occupation rate and in turn lower the payout, no matter how low the fed cuts rates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What made you click for CRH? The 15% payout is interesting, but most of their malls are 100% rented. A slowdown would certainly cripple their occupation rate and in turn lower the payout, no matter how low the fed cuts rates.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
