It seems you have JavaScript disabled.

Ummm.. Yeah... I'm going to have to ask you to turn Javascript back on... Yeah... Thanks.

Revisiting the 26% VIX Drop




On June 15th, the VIX fell almost 26% (green arrow). And as I’ve already mentioned before, whenever the volatility index falls more than 10% in a day, historically, the following 10 trading days the market is higher.

The day after volatility was crushed, the S&P 500 opened at 1256.16. Ten trading days later on June 29th, the index was at 1272.87 - 16.71 points higher. This was in keeping with the historical pattern of this signal and was a welcome result since last time things did not work out as well.

VIX falls 26 pc.png

But there are two things that you have to keep in mind. One, there was a negative incursion of 19 points before the 16.71 point advance. And two, it is questionable if we would have been a positive result without Thursday’s Fed announcement bull rampage.

Since I’m not a systematic trader, I only offer this concept as a backdrop. But if you are a systematic trader, the fact that most of this higher close came about as a result of one day and a very rare day, wouldn’t matter. At the same time, I don’t think any good system would risk 19 points to gain 17 points.

Interestingly enough, on June 29th the VIX again fell more than 10% - about 17.5% (purple arrow). So I’ll revisit this again in about 10 trading days to see how the latest signal worked out.

For more on the change (rather than absolute reading) of the volatility index and its interplay with the market, check out this recent article from Mark Hulbert.

Technorati , , , , , ,

Enjoyed this? Don't miss the next one, grab the feed  or 

                               subscribe through email:  


One Response to “Revisiting the 26% VIX Drop”  

  1. 1 Revisiting the 17.5% VIX Drop at Trader’s Narrative


Leave a Reply



Recent Comments

  • b patient : I honestly don’t know how Vonage gets away with advertising “No Contracts” but then holds…
  • Babak : thanks but I hardly watch CNBC anymore, someone told me they mentioned my blog last…
  • TONY : Babak, The scary thing is that many indicators have failed in detecting the bottom of this…
  • Anon : Babak, Matt Nesto of CNBC did this analysis, too, on “CNBC Reports” at about 8…
  • Home Builder : The housing market index is not looking too good. The fact that home builders are…
  • Andrew : Aussie REITS have also been crushed, yields are very attractive… but…. I’m waiting still, nothing…
  • Michael : The reason for failure I believe is simple. This particular technical indicator is not old…

  feed

 Or subscribe through email:

Creative Commons License

Disclaimer

The contents of this website are presented for informational purposes only. They should not be viewed as investment advice, nor a solicitation to buy or sell any financial securities. Neither, TradersNarrative.com, its owners, and/or its representatives are registered as securities broker-dealers or investment advisors with any securities regulatory authority, in any jurisdiction.