Comments on: Sentiment Overview: Week of March 28th, 2008 http://www.tradersnarrative.com/sentiment-overview-week-of-march-28th-2008-1606.html Freshly squeezed market commentary & analysis Sun, 08 Nov 2009 02:22:22 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2 by: Sentiment Overview: Week Of April 4th, 2008 http://www.tradersnarrative.com/sentiment-overview-week-of-march-28th-2008-1606.html#comment-32543 Mon, 07 Apr 2008 05:23:30 +0000 http://www.tradersnarrative.com/sentiment-overview-week-of-march-28th-2008-1606.html#comment-32543 [...] Sentiment Surveys According to Investor’s Intelligence, newsletter editors are pretty much were they were when we did an overview of sentiment last week. With 36% bullish and 37% bearish, we continue to have very good grounds for a rally. [...] […] Sentiment Surveys According to Investor’s Intelligence, newsletter editors are pretty much were they were when we did an overview of sentiment last week. With 36% bullish and 37% bearish, we continue to have very good grounds for a rally. […]

]]> by: MrEd http://www.tradersnarrative.com/sentiment-overview-week-of-march-28th-2008-1606.html#comment-32442 Sat, 29 Mar 2008 21:31:10 +0000 http://www.tradersnarrative.com/sentiment-overview-week-of-march-28th-2008-1606.html#comment-32442 The S&P was down for the week. What launch? The S&P was down for the week. What launch?

]]> by: wes http://www.tradersnarrative.com/sentiment-overview-week-of-march-28th-2008-1606.html#comment-32438 Sat, 29 Mar 2008 00:51:24 +0000 http://www.tradersnarrative.com/sentiment-overview-week-of-march-28th-2008-1606.html#comment-32438 As usual, great stuff. This decline seems to look most like 1990. Even the "will the banks survive" theme is similar. I know it's a lot to ask, but what did these (or corresponding previous indicators) look like at the bottom then ? As usual, great stuff.

This decline seems to look most like 1990. Even the “will the banks survive” theme is similar.

I know it’s a lot to ask, but what did these (or corresponding previous indicators) look like at the bottom then ?

]]>