<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Subprime Mortgages: Then &#038; Now</title>
	<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/subprime-mortgages-then-now-1907.html</link>
	<description>Freshly squeezed market commentary &#038; analysis</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Johan Lindén</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/subprime-mortgages-then-now-1907.html#comment-34961</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 11:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/subprime-mortgages-then-now-1907.html#comment-34961</guid>
					<description>Subprime is now mentioned in google 250 times more than 2001 according to your study. 

However, the use of google and internet has evolved. So are those figures to rely on? I took more neutral words but still in the same field. If you use the words Capital and Financial you see there are now 70 times more pages now than 2001. So subprime increased 250% above the sector. I don't think that was as huge difference as I had expected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Subprime is now mentioned in google 250 times more than 2001 according to your study. </p>
<p>However, the use of google and internet has evolved. So are those figures to rely on? I took more neutral words but still in the same field. If you use the words Capital and Financial you see there are now 70 times more pages now than 2001. So subprime increased 250% above the sector. I don&#8217;t think that was as huge difference as I had expected.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Johan Lindén</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/subprime-mortgages-then-now-1907.html#comment-34960</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 11:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/subprime-mortgages-then-now-1907.html#comment-34960</guid>
					<description>Good research! :)

(I don't think results vary in that 2001 search...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good research! <img src='http://www.tradersnarrative.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>(I don&#8217;t think results vary in that 2001 search&#8230;)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
