<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Economist: Financial Whirlpool Cover</title>
	<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/the-economist-financial-whirlpool-cover-1877.html</link>
	<description>Freshly squeezed market commentary &#038; analysis</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 09:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: BourningMarkets</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/the-economist-financial-whirlpool-cover-1877.html#comment-34879</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 10:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/the-economist-financial-whirlpool-cover-1877.html#comment-34879</guid>
					<description>Babak: SPY for stock market and IEF for bonds-treasuries. Thus, the ratio gauges the trend toward risk taking versus towards safe haven. I took it from a Stockcharts newsletter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Babak: SPY for stock market and IEF for bonds-treasuries. Thus, the ratio gauges the trend toward risk taking versus towards safe haven. I took it from a Stockcharts newsletter.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Babak</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/the-economist-financial-whirlpool-cover-1877.html#comment-34875</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 05:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/the-economist-financial-whirlpool-cover-1877.html#comment-34875</guid>
					<description>Brandon, thanks :)

Bourning, good point, I would have to agree. The other indicators also point to more pain ahead. re SPY:IEF, what are we looking at exactly? I mean the rationale for the ratio?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brandon, thanks <img src='http://www.tradersnarrative.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Bourning, good point, I would have to agree. The other indicators also point to more pain ahead. re SPY:IEF, what are we looking at exactly? I mean the rationale for the ratio?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: BourningMarkets</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/the-economist-financial-whirlpool-cover-1877.html#comment-34873</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 10:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/the-economist-financial-whirlpool-cover-1877.html#comment-34873</guid>
					<description>Good cover. 

Now, taking in consideration your article &quot;When Magazine Cover Indicators Clash&quot;, and being this one from The Economist, I doubt to take it as a pessimistic contrarian indication, specially in a bear market and in mid-term. Time magazine seems a better one :)

Interesting: check SPY:IEF in Stockcharts (stocks/treasuries). Recovered important horizontal support, now in pullback. Little room to fall. (Unless a finantial meltdown, that is).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good cover. </p>
<p>Now, taking in consideration your article &#8220;When Magazine Cover Indicators Clash&#8221;, and being this one from The Economist, I doubt to take it as a pessimistic contrarian indication, specially in a bear market and in mid-term. Time magazine seems a better one <img src='http://www.tradersnarrative.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Interesting: check SPY:IEF in Stockcharts (stocks/treasuries). Recovered important horizontal support, now in pullback. Little room to fall. (Unless a finantial meltdown, that is).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/the-economist-financial-whirlpool-cover-1877.html#comment-34871</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 01:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/the-economist-financial-whirlpool-cover-1877.html#comment-34871</guid>
					<description>Hey, I just started following your blog a few days ago. It's very lucid and well though out. I'm impressed. Keep up the good work!

Brandon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I just started following your blog a few days ago. It&#8217;s very lucid and well though out. I&#8217;m impressed. Keep up the good work!</p>
<p>Brandon
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
