It seems you have JavaScript disabled.

Ummm.. Yeah... I'm going to have to ask you to turn Javascript back on... Yeah... Thanks.

The Paradox Of Thrift at Trader’s Narrative




The Paradox Of Thrift


Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/traders/public_html/wp-includes/functions-formatting.php on line 76

James Montier’s latest missive from GMO is about the macro-economic scenario and whether the new austerity movement will ultimately help or hinder a recovery.

Montier points to the paradox of thrift: if everyone attempts to save more, then this reduction in spending will cascade through the economy, lowering incomes and negating any gains and instead hurling the economy into a vicious downward spiral.

The danger is that austerity could plunge a fragile recovery back into a deflationary tailspin. Montier cites the Japanese experience where fiscal tightening caused several needless recessions:

Montier paradox of thrift Japan Jul 2010

Montier is worried that “policy error” - that is, removing monetary and fiscal stimulus - will likely cause a deflationary spiral. As well, you can’t go wrong fading Alan Greenspan who’s recent jeremiad in the Wall Street Journal urged the US to “rein in budget deficits”.

If there is one thing I’ve learned watching Greenspan over the years, it is that he is as perfect a fade as you’ll find. Whether it is about the price of natural gas, Adjustable Rate Mortgages, the housing market, etc. just listen to what he says and do the exact opposite to come out ahead.

The question of inflation or deflation, is correctly, a major preoccupation of most market participants. I’ve been saying for a while that the ultimate question is whether deflation or inflation will win. If you can nail the answer to this one question, you’re set for basically every single major financial decision whether it is about equities, bonds, commodities, etc.

Montier believes that deflation will win or has won but that since it will cause Bernanke to institute a second round of quantitative easing, inflation will eventually rear its head. In any case, I’m glad to find out that Montier agrees with me that bonds are overpriced:

Generally, we simply can’t bring ourselves to own bonds at the yields on offer in most markets today.

In fact, US government bonds are the second worst asset class (1%) in GMO’s projected 7 year forward forecast. Naturally, this is also the sentiment that Jeremy Grantham shared in his own latest quarterly letter.

Finally, to reconcile the ongoing battle between the Austerians and the Keynesians, Montier quotes Blanchard and Cottarelli who have offered “10 Commandments” to reconcile. You can read Montier’s complete message below:

Enjoyed this? Don't miss the next one, grab the feed  or 

                               subscribe through email:  

One Response to “The Paradox Of Thrift”  

  1. 1 Steve

    Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/traders/public_html/wp-includes/functions-formatting.php on line 76

    “if everyone attempts to save more, then this reduction in spending will cascade through the economy, lowering incomes and negating any gains and instead hurling the economy into a vicious downward spiral.”

    Lets change it around. “if everyone attempts to spend more, then this increase in spending will cascade through the economy, raising incomes and negating any loses and instead hurling the economy into a virtuous upward spiral.”

    Well the savings rate in the US declined in percentage terms every year from the 1980’s till 2008. I guess according to St. Keynes real incomes must have rose during that period because of all that consumption! LMAO!!

    Maybe a better title for your article would be “The Paradox of the Paradox of Thrift.”

Leave a Reply