<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ticker Sense Blogger Sentiment Provides No Edge</title>
	<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/ticker-sense-blogger-sentiment-provides-no-edge-1065.html</link>
	<description>Freshly squeezed market commentary &#038; analysis</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Sentiment Overview: Week Of February 1st, 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/ticker-sense-blogger-sentiment-provides-no-edge-1065.html#comment-28951</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 16:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/ticker-sense-blogger-sentiment-provides-no-edge-1065.html#comment-28951</guid>
					<description>[...] UPDATE: Its been a while since I mentioned the TickerSense blogger sentiment poll but I just noticed that the bulls are at only 24% while the bears are at 44%. This is the highest disparity between the two camps since March 12th, 2007 when bloggers were 13.16% bullish and 42.11% bearish. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] UPDATE: Its been a while since I mentioned the TickerSense blogger sentiment poll but I just noticed that the bulls are at only 24% while the bears are at 44%. This is the highest disparity between the two camps since March 12th, 2007 when bloggers were 13.16% bullish and 42.11% bearish. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Babak</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/ticker-sense-blogger-sentiment-provides-no-edge-1065.html#comment-8004</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/ticker-sense-blogger-sentiment-provides-no-edge-1065.html#comment-8004</guid>
					<description>David,
good point. Sentiment is only a guide. Not gospel. Today I mentioned a few measures of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tradersnarrative.com/you-call-that-a-correction-1077.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;what people are actually doing&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,<br />
good point. Sentiment is only a guide. Not gospel. Today I mentioned a few measures of <a href="http://www.tradersnarrative.com/you-call-that-a-correction-1077.html" rel="nofollow">what people are actually doing</a>.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: David Merkel</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/ticker-sense-blogger-sentiment-provides-no-edge-1065.html#comment-7965</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 04:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/ticker-sense-blogger-sentiment-provides-no-edge-1065.html#comment-7965</guid>
					<description>Hi.  I write for RealMoney, and also my own blog, Aleph Blog.  I usually ignore most surveys of what people think about the market; there is often no money on the line behind those opinions.  What I want to know, and try to figure out, is what people are relying on.  If people are relying on a certain investment result to occur, and it doesn't happen, or much worse, the trade goes the wrong way, then regret kicks in, and we get panicky selling or short covering.

I guess another way to say it is I try to figure out whether an asset is predominantly held by strong or weak holders (shorts are almost  always weak); that helps me figure out what might happen in the short run as to what sort of price reaction we could get from a negative or positive event.

I throw this out for what it is worth.  I had a series of articles on this topic at RealMoney.  

Take care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi.  I write for RealMoney, and also my own blog, Aleph Blog.  I usually ignore most surveys of what people think about the market; there is often no money on the line behind those opinions.  What I want to know, and try to figure out, is what people are relying on.  If people are relying on a certain investment result to occur, and it doesn&#8217;t happen, or much worse, the trade goes the wrong way, then regret kicks in, and we get panicky selling or short covering.</p>
<p>I guess another way to say it is I try to figure out whether an asset is predominantly held by strong or weak holders (shorts are almost  always weak); that helps me figure out what might happen in the short run as to what sort of price reaction we could get from a negative or positive event.</p>
<p>I throw this out for what it is worth.  I had a series of articles on this topic at RealMoney.  </p>
<p>Take care.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
