<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Timing The Stock Market Using The Dow Jones Average</title>
	<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/timing-the-stock-market-using-the-dow-jones-average-742.html</link>
	<description>Freshly squeezed market commentary &#038; analysis</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: AUGUST LOCALLO</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/timing-the-stock-market-using-the-dow-jones-average-742.html#comment-69539</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/timing-the-stock-market-using-the-dow-jones-average-742.html#comment-69539</guid>
					<description>Market Internals

Looks So Good Yet It Can Be Bearish

Again, the high low index reached 99/5% last Thursday. It dropped to 99.2% on Friday. This could lead to a moderate sell off in the market. This assumes the market cannot get much better than what we have last seen. Also, the 30 day breath
and highs and lows will be tested.For example, after the next two days of trading,
the 30 day breath has to take off 22 out of 25 days of trading are all positive breath
figures. Right now the 30 day breath is a positive 17000. As always, this will be closely watched. Another factor is the 10 day 30 day high low. The 10 day high low
just dropped to 391. The 30 day high low is at 237 and climbing. Watch to see if the 
10 drops below the rising 30 day figure. Lastly, the Dow Jones Utility average is only
1 full point above its 150 day average. After 4 trading days the lowest price to take off is 344.I still believe that this index is giving the most blatant sell signal,although
it is not a timing tool. Next week should be another exciting adventure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Market Internals</p>
<p>Looks So Good Yet It Can Be Bearish</p>
<p>Again, the high low index reached 99/5% last Thursday. It dropped to 99.2% on Friday. This could lead to a moderate sell off in the market. This assumes the market cannot get much better than what we have last seen. Also, the 30 day breath<br />
and highs and lows will be tested.For example, after the next two days of trading,<br />
the 30 day breath has to take off 22 out of 25 days of trading are all positive breath<br />
figures. Right now the 30 day breath is a positive 17000. As always, this will be closely watched. Another factor is the 10 day 30 day high low. The 10 day high low<br />
just dropped to 391. The 30 day high low is at 237 and climbing. Watch to see if the<br />
10 drops below the rising 30 day figure. Lastly, the Dow Jones Utility average is only<br />
1 full point above its 150 day average. After 4 trading days the lowest price to take off is 344.I still believe that this index is giving the most blatant sell signal,although<br />
it is not a timing tool. Next week should be another exciting adventure.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Winston Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/timing-the-stock-market-using-the-dow-jones-average-742.html#comment-52417</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 06:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/timing-the-stock-market-using-the-dow-jones-average-742.html#comment-52417</guid>
					<description>does this also mean that above 70% means get short (or at least out of long positions)?

can't see why it wouldn't.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does this also mean that above 70% means get short (or at least out of long positions)?</p>
<p>can&#8217;t see why it wouldn&#8217;t.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Yaser</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/timing-the-stock-market-using-the-dow-jones-average-742.html#comment-4855</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 21:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/timing-the-stock-market-using-the-dow-jones-average-742.html#comment-4855</guid>
					<description>Great post, I think this can be utilize in tandem with Dr. Brett's Relative Volume Flow, keep it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, I think this can be utilize in tandem with Dr. Brett&#8217;s Relative Volume Flow, keep it up.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Babak</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/timing-the-stock-market-using-the-dow-jones-average-742.html#comment-4851</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 17:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/timing-the-stock-market-using-the-dow-jones-average-742.html#comment-4851</guid>
					<description>CP: Thanks for pointing that out. Do you have a graph of the indicator for those years or is it your suspicion that it would be reversed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CP: Thanks for pointing that out. Do you have a graph of the indicator for those years or is it your suspicion that it would be reversed?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: CrossProfit</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/timing-the-stock-market-using-the-dow-jones-average-742.html#comment-4849</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 12:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/timing-the-stock-market-using-the-dow-jones-average-742.html#comment-4849</guid>
					<description>Have you tested this theory for 2000 and 2001? In up years this should work well. In down years you will find that the reverse is correct. In other words, you will be able to predict tops and not bottoms.

Disclosure: Opinion of CrossProfit analyst, may not reflect opinion of CrossProfit.com.
http://www.crossprofit.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you tested this theory for 2000 and 2001? In up years this should work well. In down years you will find that the reverse is correct. In other words, you will be able to predict tops and not bottoms.</p>
<p>Disclosure: Opinion of CrossProfit analyst, may not reflect opinion of CrossProfit.com.<br />
<a href='http://www.crossprofit.com' rel='nofollow'>http://www.crossprofit.com</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
