<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;Way Of The Turtle&#8217; by Curtis Faith - Book Review</title>
	<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/way-of-the-turtle-by-curtis-faith-book-review-773.html</link>
	<description>Freshly squeezed market commentary &#038; analysis</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: John</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/way-of-the-turtle-by-curtis-faith-book-review-773.html#comment-27220</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 06:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/way-of-the-turtle-by-curtis-faith-book-review-773.html#comment-27220</guid>
					<description>Very Interesting info about author performance:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cftc.gov/newsroom/enforcementpressreleases/2007/pr5277-07.html&quot;&gt;CFTC&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.turtletrader.com/curtis-faith.html&quot;&gt;Turtle Trader&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very Interesting info about author performance:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cftc.gov/newsroom/enforcementpressreleases/2007/pr5277-07.html">CFTC</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.turtletrader.com/curtis-faith.html">Turtle Trader</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Babak</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/way-of-the-turtle-by-curtis-faith-book-review-773.html#comment-19978</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 00:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/way-of-the-turtle-by-curtis-faith-book-review-773.html#comment-19978</guid>
					<description>Max, thanks for the clarification. I think I meant that Tharp is viewed as the popularizer of the concept.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Max, thanks for the clarification. I think I meant that Tharp is viewed as the popularizer of the concept.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: max</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/way-of-the-turtle-by-curtis-faith-book-review-773.html#comment-19948</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 08:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/way-of-the-turtle-by-curtis-faith-book-review-773.html#comment-19948</guid>
					<description>Nice review on the book

You state in your rewiew …..”I found it reaffirming to find Curtis talking about the concept of R so matter of factly - which is a tribute to Tharp” 

Actually Curtis sites Chuck Branscomb as the inventor of &quot;R&quot; Multiples on page 59

Cheers max</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice review on the book</p>
<p>You state in your rewiew …..”I found it reaffirming to find Curtis talking about the concept of R so matter of factly - which is a tribute to Tharp” </p>
<p>Actually Curtis sites Chuck Branscomb as the inventor of &#8220;R&#8221; Multiples on page 59</p>
<p>Cheers max
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jack Hershey&#8217;s Incomprehensible Method</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/way-of-the-turtle-by-curtis-faith-book-review-773.html#comment-7357</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 23:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/way-of-the-turtle-by-curtis-faith-book-review-773.html#comment-7357</guid>
					<description>[...] This week I&amp;#8217;ve been re-reading Curtis Faith&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;Way of the Turtle&amp;#8221; when I came to this part: One sure sign of a Pseudo-expert is writing that is unclear and difficult to follow. Unclear writing comes from unclear thinking. A true expert will be able to explain complicated ideas in ways that are clear and easy to understand. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] This week I&#8217;ve been re-reading Curtis Faith&#8217;s &#8220;Way of the Turtle&#8221; when I came to this part: One sure sign of a Pseudo-expert is writing that is unclear and difficult to follow. Unclear writing comes from unclear thinking. A true expert will be able to explain complicated ideas in ways that are clear and easy to understand. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: &#8220;Way of the Turtle&#8221; Book Giveaway</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/way-of-the-turtle-by-curtis-faith-book-review-773.html#comment-5403</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 18:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/way-of-the-turtle-by-curtis-faith-book-review-773.html#comment-5403</guid>
					<description>[...] After writing my review of Curtis Faith&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;Way of the Turtle&amp;#8220;, he graciously sent me a signed copy of the book as a gift. Which means that my original copy is now redundant. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] After writing my review of Curtis Faith&#8217;s &#8220;Way of the Turtle&#8220;, he graciously sent me a signed copy of the book as a gift. Which means that my original copy is now redundant. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Phantom of the Pits</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/way-of-the-turtle-by-curtis-faith-book-review-773.html#comment-5402</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 18:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/way-of-the-turtle-by-curtis-faith-book-review-773.html#comment-5402</guid>
					<description>You have great insight and did a good review.
It onlly gets better!
Thank you,

POP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have great insight and did a good review.<br />
It onlly gets better!<br />
Thank you,</p>
<p>POP
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Babak</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/way-of-the-turtle-by-curtis-faith-book-review-773.html#comment-5184</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 20:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/way-of-the-turtle-by-curtis-faith-book-review-773.html#comment-5184</guid>
					<description>Michael D,
I don't want to get into a hair splitting contest :) what I meant is that I don't see the same 'love of the craft' in Covel, that Schwager has. Just a personal opinion. Also Schwager has done &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2007/04/07/cnschwager07.xml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;other stuff&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael D,<br />
I don&#8217;t want to get into a hair splitting contest <img src='http://www.tradersnarrative.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  what I meant is that I don&#8217;t see the same &#8216;love of the craft&#8217; in Covel, that Schwager has. Just a personal opinion. Also Schwager has done <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2007/04/07/cnschwager07.xml" rel="nofollow">other stuff</a>.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Michael D</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/way-of-the-turtle-by-curtis-faith-book-review-773.html#comment-5182</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 18:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/way-of-the-turtle-by-curtis-faith-book-review-773.html#comment-5182</guid>
					<description>Babak,

Covel's not a writer?

One of Covel's favorite rhetorical tricks is to post oppositional views on his web site and then dismiss their arguments by complaining that they haven't defined their terms. You stoop to the same tactics.

In your next post, I'm waiting for you to say that I just &quot;don't get it.&quot; Another Covelesque rhetorical trick. 

You might have noted in your Schwager homage that he was, by his own admission, a failed trader when he wrote the first Wizards book. Covel probably falls into that category as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Babak,</p>
<p>Covel&#8217;s not a writer?</p>
<p>One of Covel&#8217;s favorite rhetorical tricks is to post oppositional views on his web site and then dismiss their arguments by complaining that they haven&#8217;t defined their terms. You stoop to the same tactics.</p>
<p>In your next post, I&#8217;m waiting for you to say that I just &#8220;don&#8217;t get it.&#8221; Another Covelesque rhetorical trick. </p>
<p>You might have noted in your Schwager homage that he was, by his own admission, a failed trader when he wrote the first Wizards book. Covel probably falls into that category as well.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Babak</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/way-of-the-turtle-by-curtis-faith-book-review-773.html#comment-5157</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 22:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/way-of-the-turtle-by-curtis-faith-book-review-773.html#comment-5157</guid>
					<description>MichaelD:
I'm not sure we can accurately describe Covel as a 'writer' since his books are merely meant as advertisements for his &lt;strike&gt;$2000&lt;/strike&gt; $1000 'turtle' course. 

Schwager on the other is truly interested in trading. As you pointed out, only one chapter is devoted to turtles in one of his books. He has also written on technical analysis. And also he is a futures trader himself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MichaelD:<br />
I&#8217;m not sure we can accurately describe Covel as a &#8216;writer&#8217; since his books are merely meant as advertisements for his <strike>$2000</strike> $1000 &#8216;turtle&#8217; course. </p>
<p>Schwager on the other is truly interested in trading. As you pointed out, only one chapter is devoted to turtles in one of his books. He has also written on technical analysis. And also he is a futures trader himself.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Michael D</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/way-of-the-turtle-by-curtis-faith-book-review-773.html#comment-5155</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 22:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/way-of-the-turtle-by-curtis-faith-book-review-773.html#comment-5155</guid>
					<description>Babak,

Using your logic, it could be said that Schwager made money off the turtles by including a chapter about them in his wizards book. I'm guessing you're not going to slam Schwager. 

Covel is a writer. Most writers write about other people. People they usually are not 'associated' with. Wallstrip said it best: &quot;Covel is not a turtle and not a trader&quot;. 

Covel's problem is that he comes across as a complete dickhead. I still like his book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Babak,</p>
<p>Using your logic, it could be said that Schwager made money off the turtles by including a chapter about them in his wizards book. I&#8217;m guessing you&#8217;re not going to slam Schwager. </p>
<p>Covel is a writer. Most writers write about other people. People they usually are not &#8216;associated&#8217; with. Wallstrip said it best: &#8220;Covel is not a turtle and not a trader&#8221;. </p>
<p>Covel&#8217;s problem is that he comes across as a complete dickhead. I still like his book.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
