<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Happens This Far Above The 200 Moving Average?</title>
	<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/what-happens-this-far-above-the-200-moving-average-3007.html</link>
	<description>Freshly squeezed market commentary &#038; analysis</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 21:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Reinko</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/what-happens-this-far-above-the-200-moving-average-3007.html#comment-55282</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 21:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/what-happens-this-far-above-the-200-moving-average-3007.html#comment-55282</guid>
					<description>Nice statistics, after the biggest decline there is a wonderful spike up in the S&amp;#38;P500.

It also looks like the spikes are getting bigger, so voila more real money to be made!

We only have to wait a week or two for a next round of earnings in the S&amp;#38;P stuff, we'll see how the green shooters fare...

Barry notes the so called 'oversold conditions' at dates like 09 March 2009, from a statistical point of view this could be true.

But even at market low there still was about 4  trillion US$ too much in the system preventing the economical stuff growth from getting real.

Lets leave it with that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice statistics, after the biggest decline there is a wonderful spike up in the S&amp;P500.</p>
<p>It also looks like the spikes are getting bigger, so voila more real money to be made!</p>
<p>We only have to wait a week or two for a next round of earnings in the S&amp;P stuff, we&#8217;ll see how the green shooters fare&#8230;</p>
<p>Barry notes the so called &#8216;oversold conditions&#8217; at dates like 09 March 2009, from a statistical point of view this could be true.</p>
<p>But even at market low there still was about 4  trillion US$ too much in the system preventing the economical stuff growth from getting real.</p>
<p>Lets leave it with that&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chris Maye</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/what-happens-this-far-above-the-200-moving-average-3007.html#comment-55265</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/what-happens-this-far-above-the-200-moving-average-3007.html#comment-55265</guid>
					<description>&quot;The stock market is never obvious. It is designed to fool most of the people most of the time.&quot;---Jesse Livermore</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The stock market is never obvious. It is designed to fool most of the people most of the time.&#8221;&#8212;Jesse Livermore
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/what-happens-this-far-above-the-200-moving-average-3007.html#comment-55252</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 22:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/what-happens-this-far-above-the-200-moving-average-3007.html#comment-55252</guid>
					<description>Brilliant, keep up the good analysis Babak</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant, keep up the good analysis Babak
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Damien Hoffman</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/what-happens-this-far-above-the-200-moving-average-3007.html#comment-55245</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/what-happens-this-far-above-the-200-moving-average-3007.html#comment-55245</guid>
					<description>Babak,

I reposted this excellent piece as our trading feature today. Also, I emailed you ... but it bounced back. You may consider using a gmail account while your other is having issues.

Looking forward to your response.

Damien</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Babak,</p>
<p>I reposted this excellent piece as our trading feature today. Also, I emailed you &#8230; but it bounced back. You may consider using a gmail account while your other is having issues.</p>
<p>Looking forward to your response.</p>
<p>Damien
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Pej</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/what-happens-this-far-above-the-200-moving-average-3007.html#comment-55241</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 16:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/what-happens-this-far-above-the-200-moving-average-3007.html#comment-55241</guid>
					<description>Cool report indeed. I think the only conclusion is that the mean return is weak, but that the tails are very fat in this sample. Which means that the mean is &lt;i&gt;mean&lt;/i&gt;ingless?
sorry for the pathetic pun. The conclusion is real though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool report indeed. I think the only conclusion is that the mean return is weak, but that the tails are very fat in this sample. Which means that the mean is <i>mean</i>ingless?<br />
sorry for the pathetic pun. The conclusion is real though.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: wayne</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/what-happens-this-far-above-the-200-moving-average-3007.html#comment-55239</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/what-happens-this-far-above-the-200-moving-average-3007.html#comment-55239</guid>
					<description>Barry

Compelling data, good research, hard to argue with.  

I do struggle to compare 87 to 09.  87 came after a five year bull market that started in 82 with a fed the had made 4 rounds of fed hikes in 87 and a Tbond yields that went about 10.02% on Oct 12th

Ill, try to keep an open mind and I may study this more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barry</p>
<p>Compelling data, good research, hard to argue with.  </p>
<p>I do struggle to compare 87 to 09.  87 came after a five year bull market that started in 82 with a fed the had made 4 rounds of fed hikes in 87 and a Tbond yields that went about 10.02% on Oct 12th</p>
<p>Ill, try to keep an open mind and I may study this more.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Barry Ritholtz</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/what-happens-this-far-above-the-200-moving-average-3007.html#comment-55237</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/what-happens-this-far-above-the-200-moving-average-3007.html#comment-55237</guid>
					<description>Nice!

What made the collapse so fascinating form a technical perspective was how far oversold the markets got. We were down to 1% of S&amp;#38;P500 stocks were trading over their 200 day moving average

I would be curious if we could separate the overbought conditions at the start of new bull markets (1980-82) versus bear market rallies (1973-74) -- 

How do they look?  Are they different technically?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice!</p>
<p>What made the collapse so fascinating form a technical perspective was how far oversold the markets got. We were down to 1% of S&amp;P500 stocks were trading over their 200 day moving average</p>
<p>I would be curious if we could separate the overbought conditions at the start of new bull markets (1980-82) versus bear market rallies (1973-74) &#8212; </p>
<p>How do they look?  Are they different technically?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
