<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When to Use Relative Strength</title>
	<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/when-to-use-relative-strength-41.html</link>
	<description>Freshly squeezed market commentary &#038; analysis</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Merck&#8217;s Relative Strength Continues at Trader&#8217;s Narrative</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/when-to-use-relative-strength-41.html#comment-659</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 05:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/when-to-use-relative-strength-41.html#comment-659</guid>
					<description>[...] With the tape being so red, it is always interesting to find pockets of relative strength. One area of strength has been the big pharmas. I&amp;#8217;ve already mentioned before that I really like this sector and Merck specifically. So far, Merck has performed brilliantly: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] With the tape being so red, it is always interesting to find pockets of relative strength. One area of strength has been the big pharmas. I&#8217;ve already mentioned before that I really like this sector and Merck specifically. So far, Merck has performed brilliantly: [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Healthcare Sector Looks Interesting at Trader&#8217;s Narrative</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/when-to-use-relative-strength-41.html#comment-59</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 21:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/when-to-use-relative-strength-41.html#comment-59</guid>
					<description>[...] You already know that I&amp;#8217;m partial to Merck. I still like it because it has one of the better technical pictures from among the big pharma companies. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] You already know that I&#8217;m partial to Merck. I still like it because it has one of the better technical pictures from among the big pharma companies. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Babak</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/when-to-use-relative-strength-41.html#comment-38</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 16:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/when-to-use-relative-strength-41.html#comment-38</guid>
					<description>Thanks Peter. What PTF describes in the quote you provide is right on the money. It's all about risk! and mitigating it and benefiting from it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Peter. What PTF describes in the quote you provide is right on the money. It&#8217;s all about risk! and mitigating it and benefiting from it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/when-to-use-relative-strength-41.html#comment-5</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 12:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/when-to-use-relative-strength-41.html#comment-5</guid>
					<description>Hello Trader

about PTJ, heres a quote from an interview in 2000

&quot;I’d say that my investment philosophy is that I don’t take a lot of risk, I look for opportunities with tremendously skewed reward-risk opportunities. Don’t ever let them get into your pocket - that means there’s no reason to leverage substantially. There’s no reason to take substantial amounts of financial risk ever, because you should always be able to find something where you can skew the reward risk relationship so greatly in your favor that you can take a variety of small investments with great reward risk opportunities that should give you minimum draw down pain and maximum upside opportunities.&quot; 

thats why he love to pick tops and bottoms, i guess.. :)

regards

peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Trader</p>
<p>about PTJ, heres a quote from an interview in 2000</p>
<p>&#8220;I’d say that my investment philosophy is that I don’t take a lot of risk, I look for opportunities with tremendously skewed reward-risk opportunities. Don’t ever let them get into your pocket - that means there’s no reason to leverage substantially. There’s no reason to take substantial amounts of financial risk ever, because you should always be able to find something where you can skew the reward risk relationship so greatly in your favor that you can take a variety of small investments with great reward risk opportunities that should give you minimum draw down pain and maximum upside opportunities.&#8221; </p>
<p>thats why he love to pick tops and bottoms, i guess.. <img src='http://www.tradersnarrative.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>regards</p>
<p>peter
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
