<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why R?</title>
	<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/why-r-155.html</link>
	<description>Freshly squeezed market commentary &#038; analysis</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: How to Fail As a Trader in 10 Easy Steps</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/why-r-155.html#comment-6401</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 20:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/why-r-155.html#comment-6401</guid>
					<description>[...] 3 Compare yourself to other traders, not yourself Don&amp;#8217;t use R or any of that weird stuff like MFE/MAE. Instead compare yourself to other traders using dollar amounts. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] 3 Compare yourself to other traders, not yourself Don&#8217;t use R or any of that weird stuff like MFE/MAE. Instead compare yourself to other traders using dollar amounts. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: &#8216;Way Of The Turtle&#8217; by Curtis Faith - Book Review at Trader&#8217;s Narrative</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/why-r-155.html#comment-5065</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 23:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/why-r-155.html#comment-5065</guid>
					<description>[...] I found it reaffirming to find Curtis talking about the concept of R so matter of factly - which is a tribute to Tharp since &amp;#8216;R&amp;#8217; has become an integral part of trading culture within only a few years after its introduction. But more interesting was Curtis&amp;#8217; introduction of a similar concept he calls &amp;#8216;E&amp;#8217; or &amp;#8216;E-ratio&amp;#8217;. This refers to the effectiveness of entry into a trade, just as R refers to the result of a trade - measured by unit of risk. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I found it reaffirming to find Curtis talking about the concept of R so matter of factly - which is a tribute to Tharp since &#8216;R&#8217; has become an integral part of trading culture within only a few years after its introduction. But more interesting was Curtis&#8217; introduction of a similar concept he calls &#8216;E&#8217; or &#8216;E-ratio&#8217;. This refers to the effectiveness of entry into a trade, just as R refers to the result of a trade - measured by unit of risk. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Expansion Follows Contraction - ESCL at Trader&#8217;s Narrative</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/why-r-155.html#comment-24</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 22:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/why-r-155.html#comment-24</guid>
					<description>[...] Risk is the most important element in trading. By watching for expansion and contraction, we can pinpoint potential entries that allow for risk to be clearly defined. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Risk is the most important element in trading. By watching for expansion and contraction, we can pinpoint potential entries that allow for risk to be clearly defined. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Wilson Ma</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/why-r-155.html#comment-20</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 01:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/why-r-155.html#comment-20</guid>
					<description>Dr. Alexander Elder also mentioned this in his writings.  Another part of this &quot;R&quot; stuff would be exposure.  I think exposure matters more than R because it incorporates _aggregate_ R.  IE You can have 2% R per trade and Max Exposure of 6%, meaning 3 positoins maxed out at 2% etc... or you can have 1.5% R per trade and have 4 positions maxed out at 1.5%... I've found this helpful because sometimes I find my portfolio overconcentrated.. so I'm leaning toward reducing initial R but maintaining exposure (or aggregate R's), that way it allows for smaller size per position, but maintaining the same amount of risk -- just spread over more positions.

Ya dig?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Alexander Elder also mentioned this in his writings.  Another part of this &#8220;R&#8221; stuff would be exposure.  I think exposure matters more than R because it incorporates _aggregate_ R.  IE You can have 2% R per trade and Max Exposure of 6%, meaning 3 positoins maxed out at 2% etc&#8230; or you can have 1.5% R per trade and have 4 positions maxed out at 1.5%&#8230; I&#8217;ve found this helpful because sometimes I find my portfolio overconcentrated.. so I&#8217;m leaning toward reducing initial R but maintaining exposure (or aggregate R&#8217;s), that way it allows for smaller size per position, but maintaining the same amount of risk &#8212; just spread over more positions.</p>
<p>Ya dig?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Trader Eyal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Several interesting posts</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/why-r-155.html#comment-19</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 00:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/why-r-155.html#comment-19</guid>
					<description>[...] Sharky on To R Or Not To R Trader&amp;#8217;s Narrative on Why R? Stocktickr Commentary on R [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Sharky on To R Or Not To R Trader&#8217;s Narrative on Why R? Stocktickr Commentary on R [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/why-r-155.html#comment-18</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 18:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/why-r-155.html#comment-18</guid>
					<description>Great post on R.  Risk is everything!  Being able to handle it is critical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post on R.  Risk is everything!  Being able to handle it is critical.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Eyal</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/why-r-155.html#comment-17</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 15:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/why-r-155.html#comment-17</guid>
					<description>Great post. I like the way you defined the responsibility of a trader in terms of risk. I know that as a newbie to trading I had a hard time understanding what risk in trading really meant.

Thanks for the links as well :)

Eyal</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. I like the way you defined the responsibility of a trader in terms of risk. I know that as a newbie to trading I had a hard time understanding what risk in trading really meant.</p>
<p>Thanks for the links as well <img src='http://www.tradersnarrative.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Eyal
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/why-r-155.html#comment-16</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 11:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/why-r-155.html#comment-16</guid>
					<description>That is the best explanation I have heard yet.

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is the best explanation I have heard yet.</p>
<p>Thanks.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
