<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You Call That a Correction?</title>
	<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/you-call-that-a-correction-1077.html</link>
	<description>Freshly squeezed market commentary &#038; analysis</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Bear Stearns &#38; the Subprime Meltdown</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/you-call-that-a-correction-1077.html#comment-8559</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 22:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/you-call-that-a-correction-1077.html#comment-8559</guid>
					<description>[...] I&amp;#8217;ve been making some bearish noises for a while now. And I think we&amp;#8217;re still not in the clear. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I&#8217;ve been making some bearish noises for a while now. And I think we&#8217;re still not in the clear. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Stock Market Recap for June 20, 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/you-call-that-a-correction-1077.html#comment-8305</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 01:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/you-call-that-a-correction-1077.html#comment-8305</guid>
					<description>[...] Sentiment wise, while I was a bit concerned about the Investor&amp;#8217;s Intelligence numbers before, now it has become undoubtably negative. Just today the II&amp;#8217;s bears shrank to less than 19%. You&amp;#8217;d have to go back to the summer of 2004 to find a lower number. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Sentiment wise, while I was a bit concerned about the Investor&#8217;s Intelligence numbers before, now it has become undoubtably negative. Just today the II&#8217;s bears shrank to less than 19%. You&#8217;d have to go back to the summer of 2004 to find a lower number. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Babak</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/you-call-that-a-correction-1077.html#comment-8168</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/you-call-that-a-correction-1077.html#comment-8168</guid>
					<description>Prospectus,
the information comes directly from the NYSE. You can also get it through various technical analysis services like sentimentrader or decision point, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prospectus,<br />
the information comes directly from the NYSE. You can also get it through various technical analysis services like sentimentrader or decision point, etc.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Prospectus</title>
		<link>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/you-call-that-a-correction-1077.html#comment-8040</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 16:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tradersnarrative.com/you-call-that-a-correction-1077.html#comment-8040</guid>
					<description>Nice analysis, Babak.  Please, keep going for hours!

Where do you look at the odd lot purchases?  How can you tell that that the odd lots are buys or sells by small investors?  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice analysis, Babak.  Please, keep going for hours!</p>
<p>Where do you look at the odd lot purchases?  How can you tell that that the odd lots are buys or sells by small investors?  Thanks.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
